Search for: "Nicks v. United States"
Results 321 - 340
of 385
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2011, 11:07 am
The United States Supreme Court ruled in Berkemer v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 2:56 pm
It believes that “the primary legal materials of the United States are the raw materials of our democracy. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 9:27 am
A successful prosecution with the narrower continuation in the United States could then be used in the PPH. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 7:03 pm
It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.Chief Justice John Marshall, Marbury v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 4:30 am
He is now a United States Magistrate Judge for the U.S. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:23 pm
This trend was halted by the United States Supreme Court in the summer of 2002 in Holmes Group, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 4:31 am
In Sands v The State of South Australia ([2010] SASC 340) the Supreme Court considered an application for a stay on the grounds of public interest immunity in an action for libel and misfeasance arising out of statements made in the course of a murder investigation. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 4:13 pm
Notes that European Union and United States officials will kick off talks in Washington on 9 Dec 2010 on a personal data protection agreement when cooperating to fight terrorism or crime. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 10:21 am
"If they decide to hear our case, then the issue will be front and center before the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 1:49 am
A crowd of over 50 participants, coming from as far afield as Belgium, Germany, Spain and the United States, enjoyed over two hours of professional information-exchange, high-quality networking, wine and salmon. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 2:20 am
The debate over judges’ prejudices is still much more alive in the United States than it is here, but that doesn’t mean we should continue to ignore it, particularly after the passing of the Human Rights Act which means courts are ruling on increasingly sensitive social issues. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:18 pm
Gonzalez, Chief Judge of the United States District Court, Southern District of California, in granting a plaintiff’s motion for a Temporary Restraining Order, stopped Washington Mutual or “WaMu” from foreclosing on the plaintiff’s home. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:00 am
Lawyers for Matt Neumann and Nick Tides are currently finishing their last brief to the U.S. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 4:43 pm
Ultimately the latter argument ignores the fact that we willingly signed up to the European Union, and whilst this is not a pure federal system along the lines of the United States, where the decisions of national institutions will always trump those of individual states, it is a system which relies on a foundation of common values and rights which cross borders. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 9:37 pm
But, Winston Churchill envisaged the United States of Europe. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 3:52 am
US/ Gould v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 7:57 am
This could ultimately cost the UK a lot of money in compensation payments, although it is of note that the court has did not award compensation in Hirst or the more recent case of Frodl v Austria, The coalition government will be wary of the European Court of Human Rights’ recently acquired new powers to punish intransigent states. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 8:10 am
The released guidance identifies certain factors and circumstances that the EPA believes will lead to a “discharge into waters of the United States,” which, in turn, will trigger the NPDES permit requirement. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 10:45 pm
However, religious authorities have nowhere near the influence they have in other jurisdictions such as in the United States, as evidenced by the fact that the religious premises restriction has recently been removed by an amendment to the Equality Act 2010. [read post]
