Search for: "No Respondents Named"
Results 321 - 340
of 30,635
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2018, 7:10 am
Disbarment has been imposed by the New York Appellate Division for the First Judicial Department for misconduct after suspension In August 2015, the Attorney Grievance Committee (Committee) commenced an investigation into respondent's conduct after receiving complaints from two former clients... [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 2:00 am
The post California Employers Receive Guidelines for Responding to Virus Outbreaks appeared first on HR Daily Advisor. [read post]
19 May 2010, 2:12 am
The Respondent purchased the disputed domain name at an auction in January 2010. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 10:00 am
Instead of responding to the arbitration, Tucows commenced an action in the Ontario Superior Court claiming a declaration of its rights in the domain name and that Renner was not entitled to a transfer of the domain name. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 2:24 am
The general rule is that a respondent may permissibly register and use a domain name that is confusingly similar to the complainant’s trademark if it is descriptive of the business conducted under the domain name. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 11:04 am
The Respondent contended that “(i) the disputed domain name was purchased legally and within the legal fair use laws concerning domain names, and is being used by the Respondent under ‘Nominative Fair Use. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 2:18 am
The Complainant holds the trademark TRAVELEX; it complained that the Respondent’s registrations of and were abusive. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:18 am
The respondent has agreed to submit to arbitration only the issue of abusive registration. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 7:47 am
So it wrote to the respondent asking it to change its name. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 3:00 am
Rev. 1323 (2017)], Professor Drennan notes that naming rights often have significant value. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:23 am
The Respondent in Sun Spots forfeits the disputed domain name not because the Complainant has a registered trademark but because the Respondent and its counsel failed to support the narrative. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 5:01 pm
To her credit, Professor Ho has responded (in the comment thread on the post below): I reproduce the comment in the entirety:Jennifer Ann Ho, Ph.D. responds =========================Let me thank Professor Johnson for giving me a promotion, but I am still an assistant professor at UNC Chapel Hill. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 11:59 am
Respondent, a well-known cybersquatter, was the registrant of the disputed domain name "yamahagolfcars". [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 4:34 am
While “the Respondent’s website may suggest that the Respondent is at least known by the disputed domain name … [that] does not … provide substantial evidence that it has been ‘commonly known’ by the disputed domain name. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 9:38 am
DO NOT RESPOND. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 3:46 am
For example, if the named applicant did not exist as of the application filing date, the name may be corrected. [read post]
22 May 2008, 1:42 pm
Each patient is unique in how their bodies respond to particular medications, and there might be instances where your doctor determines an older medicine with a generic equivalent to be your best treatment option. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 12:19 pm
Respondent Mother provided the Court with the names of her two sisters. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 9:49 am
Instead of responding to the arbitration, Tucows commenced an action in the Ontario Superior Court claiming a declaration of its rights in the domain name and that Renner was not entitled to a transfer of the domain name. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 2:26 am
Moritz tried twice to wrest the domain name from the Respondent and the second time found itself on the wrong end of a finding of reverse domain name hijacking: Kur- und Verkehrsverein St. [read post]
