Search for: "O'Connor v. United States"
Results 321 - 340
of 472
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2009, 11:40 am
" 3:35: Okay, so Sotomayor is now officially blaming Sandra Day O'Connor for the wise Latina comment. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 3:39 pm
And not only that, but there is a 1988 federal United States Supreme Court case, Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 7:04 pm
But Justice Kennedy is not the swing vote of Justice O'Connor, and on questions like race, religion, abortion, and campaign finance I think he is ready and willing to continue to move the law. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 11:59 am
United States, 543 F.3d 1276 (Fed. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
Retired United States Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor sat by designation with Circuit Judges Wiener and Stewart. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 3:12 pm
I used the Navy JAG's recent reversal of the United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 11:31 pm
The 1995 case of United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 3:41 am
Clearly, O'Connor believes that women offer a qualitatively different (perhaps even better) perspective than men in certain settings.Justice GinsburgIn United States v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 5:25 pm
I was disheartened that Justice O';Connor's seat was not filled by a woman, but I remain optimistic that someday the number of women on the Supreme Court will mirror, as a percentage, the number of women in the average law school entering class. [read post]
26 May 2009, 3:46 pm
Paul Schiff Berman (Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law and Princeton University - Fellow in the Program on Law and Public Affairs, 2006-2007) has posted Federalism and International Law Through the Lens of Legal Pluralism (Missouri Law Review, Vol. 73, No. 1151, 2008) on SSRN. [read post]
20 May 2009, 4:59 am
See United States v. [read post]
17 May 2009, 6:42 am
Despite this behavior, Jefferson is a exalted figure in United States history. [read post]
16 May 2009, 9:00 pm
But even on the bench, Ginsburg has embraced gender as a source of diversity, and her opinions have challenged male judges for embracing gender-based stereotypes.In United States v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 9:14 am
In Dep't of Commerce, Justice O'Connor wrote for the 5 "conservatives" on the Court: Congress enacted the Census Act (hereinafter Census Act or Act), 13 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 3:57 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 7:48 am
But it's passing strange for anyone who believes in the Sandra Day O'Connor argument that federalism has something to do with "local control" to believe that the state legislature should make the decision instead of Austin. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 10:09 am
His verdict in Benedi v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 11:46 pm
Justice Sandra Day O';Connor's opinion for the plurality in Hamdi did reason that the "law of war" supported such a conclusion. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 2:10 pm
District Court in Boston under the name of Gill v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 8:21 am
In United States v. [read post]
