Search for: "ORDER AMENDING THE RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE COURT"
Results 321 - 340
of 10,269
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2023, 1:42 am
The most prominent law regarding the protection and removal of murals is the Visual Artist Rights Act (VARA).VARA was enacted in 1990 as an amendment to the U.S. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 6:41 am
After this amendment, defendant filed a motion under Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6) with the trial court to set aside the order imposing lifetime SBM, “arguing the change to the SBM law mere weeks after he was ordered to submit to a lifetime of SBM constituted an extraordinary circumstance warranting relief. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 2:35 am
On 1 January 2022, the HKEX amended its Listing Rules, including the Corporate Governance Code, with the aim of increasing diversity on its issuers’ boards. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 5:34 am
“A void order or judgment is, generally, one entered by a court without jurisdiction of the subject matter or the parties, or by a court that lacks the inherent power to make or enter the order involved. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 1:33 pm
License Defense Permitted Finally, in a procedural ruling, the Federal Circuit held that the district court improperly denied Intel’s request to amend its answer to add a license defense. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:49 am
Amended pre-notification rules would be subject to deferential (to the FTC) “arbitrary and capricious” review under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:15 am
” 3) EPO makes correct diagnosis but prescribes the wrong medication with the Proposed Amendments to the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal by Thorsten Bausch and Adam Lacy “The EPO has proposed new amendments to the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal (RPBA) to support more ambitious timeliness objectives. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:14 am
” 3) EPO makes correct diagnosis but prescribes the wrong medication with the Proposed Amendments to the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal by Thorsten Bausch and Adam Lacy “The EPO has proposed new amendments to the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal (RPBA) to support more ambitious timeliness objectives. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 9:23 am
However, the court ordered amendments to the TPLF agreements of both SMC and TBYP due to concerns related to control over the proceedings. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 12:35 pm
Episode description: In attempts to destabilize the West, Russia and its allies have been using migrants as pawns. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:16 am
The court says that TikTok users persuasively showed that they had unique audiences on TikTok that couldn’t be aggregated on other social media, yet the court distinguishes the WeChat ruling as purely being about Chinese-language audiences. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
The court partially blocked Smith’s effort in a ruling that relied on the Constitution’s “speech or debate” clause. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 10:46 am
So there's no per se rule against private delegations, and the rule for private delegations is the same as for public ones. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 8:58 am
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit—ruled against the agency on all three grounds. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 1:55 pm
Supreme Court ruling from Michigan v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 12:37 pm
An alternative rule that requires all matters to be brought in federal court would impose substantial costs on the judicial system. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 9:00 am
In Part I, I put some order into the welter of doctrines that relate to delegation. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 11:08 am
The law provides that the New York State Commissioner of Labor may by rule require additional terms to ensure the freelancer and hiring party understand their obligations under the law. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 6:51 pm
" But the federal gun ban against persons subject to a domestic violence protection order relies on lenient civil procedures, not strict criminal procedures, and thus facially violates the Second Amendment. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 1:33 pm
Judge Ho includes a string-cite that explains all of the ways that the Supreme Court has afforded broad constitutional protections to dangerous people: The Supreme Court has repeatedly granted relief to dangerous criminals out of concern about the procedures used to determine their dangerousness. [read post]
