Search for: "Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Grant "
Results 321 - 340
of 348
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2008, 12:15 pm
All other charges shall be heard by a single hearing officer. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 1:52 am
Avery complied with the first two demands but not the third, and was denied the opportunity to run in the election on the grounds that she had failed to accept counsel from the administration on acceptable ways to resolve her concerns about Jamfest, she had used vulgar language in her post, and she encouraged others to disrupt the business of central office, none of which were considered conduct fitting for a class officer. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 10:16 pm
[09/23] US v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Robinson, No. 08-10424 In a case involving the retroactive application of an amendment to the federal sentencing guidelines applying a two-level reduction for all crack offenses, defendant's request for counsel to represent him in his appeal of a motion for reconsideration of an order resentencing defendant without allowing him an attorney is granted where the interests of justice required that counsel be appointed to address the issues to be raised on appeal. . [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:10 pm
U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, August 28, 2008 US v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 12:14 am
On June 17, 2008, a stay of execution was granted and later vacated. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 8:35 pm
"); In re Tsoutsouris, 748 N.E.2d 856, 859 (Ind. 2001); Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 11:12 am
Ex Parte Gregory v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:45 am
Disciplinary Bd. of the State of New Mexico, No. 06-2188 In a dispute between plaintiffs, attorney and law firm, and the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of New Mexico, dismissal of plaintiffs' claims is affirmed where: 1) defendant-Board's Chief Disciplinary Counsel's actions in a matter involving plaintiffs' advertising did not infringe any constitutionally protected interest of plaintiffs; and 2) all other actions of the defendants at… [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 12:42 pm
And, according to Wait A Second, at least one District Court judge has granted an injunction to a student facing a disciplinary hearing that sought to be represented by counsel when he was also facing criminal charges. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 10:47 am
A new decision is out from CAAF today: United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
Mukasey, No. 07-2215 "Petition for review of a final order of removal, arising from a conviction for petitioner's grabbing a police officer's fingers and twisting them, is granted and the matter remanded where the BIA's finding that petitioner's state crime of "aggravated battery of a peace officer" was a crime of moral turpitude, was based on a misapprehension of Illinois law. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Van Patten, No. 07-212 Grant of habeas relief from a conviction and sentence for first-degree reckless homicide is reversed where, contrary to the ruling below, no clearly established law contrary to the state court's conclusion justified collateral relief with regard to a claim that petitioner received ineffective assistance of counsel due to his participation in a plea hearing by speaker phone. . [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:47 pm
Coughlan, Disciplinary Counsel for the Supreme Court of Ohio, appeals from the district court's grant of summary judgment to plaintiff William O'Neill in this action seeking to enjoin enforcement of three canons of the Ohio Code of Judicial Conduct. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 12:12 am
I inquired of Adam Kilgore, General Counsel of the Mississippi Bar, and he was good enough to respond on the record as follows:[B]ecause of the work we do in the Office of General Counsel (OGC), I am not at liberty to discuss specific cases until such time as the OGC takes action that is considered public. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 11:37 am
In Williams v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 11:52 am
Absolute judicial immunity attaches to a state medical review board's disciplinary proceeding where, as here, the individual charged has the right to be represented by counsel, to present evidence and to cross-examine witnesses, and where the board articulates its findings and conclusions in a binding order under a preponderance of the evidence standard. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 9:14 am
v. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 2:00 pm
(2) The attorney's residence and office address. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 10:37 am
Smith, pro se, appeals the grant of DOC's motion for judgment on the pleadings, the denial of his request for appointment of counsel, the denial of his request to amend his complaint, and the denial of his motion to compel discovery. [read post]
