Search for: "Opinion of Justices of Supreme Judicial Court" Results 321 - 340 of 11,480
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2018, 2:58 am by Walter Olson
Tags: administrative law, judicial nominations, on TV and radio, Supreme Court Awaiting a Supreme Court nominee is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 9:23 am by Bridget Crawford
Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Opinions of the United States Supreme Court has been published by Cambridge University Press. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 5:53 am by Eugene Volokh
I thought I'd pass along excerpts from the opinions concurring and dissenting as to the Michigan Supreme Court's pronouns order; recall that the order itself provides: Parties and attorneys may also include Ms., Mr., or Mx. as a preferred form of address and one of the following personal pronouns in the name section of the caption: he/him/his, she/her/hers, or they/them/theirs. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 2:30 am
These computer scientists developed a program that analyzes signed opinions to spot words, phrases and sentence structure characterizing each justice’s writing style, then uses its findings to determine the author of unsigned opinions. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 6:48 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Appeals court decisions that the justices choose not to review typically remain in effect in the judicial circuit where they were decided, operating as precedent to be followed by that appeals court and the courts below it. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 8:13 pm
And Justice Madan Lokur, in the long concurring opinion of about 300 pages, even went to elaborate it as pre-constitutional virtue. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 5:03 pm
”   The fun article, about music lyrics cited in judicial opinions, includes a sidebar, “Most-Cited Rockers in Judicial Opinions,” drawing from the research of law professor Alex B. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 8:20 am
"The Strategic Content Model of Supreme Court Opinion Writing": Yonatan Lupu and James H. [read post]
4 May 2015, 7:09 am by Ilya Shapiro
By now anyone who would be reading this will know that last week the Supreme Court decided that the First Amendment’s speech protections are weaker in the context of judicial elections than in other kinds. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 5:45 am by Mitchell Jagodinski
ShareThe debate over Supreme Court reform continued Wednesday as a White House commission heard testimony on a broad range of reform proposals, including adding seats to the court, shrinking its influence, increasing its transparency, and limiting the tenure of the justices. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 5:16 am by Kevin Frazier
Most Americans cannot identify the chief justice of their respective state supreme court, and more than half have no idea their state even has a constitution. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:38 am by Monroe Freedman
From the Judicial Ethics blog: The Supreme Court just upheld Nevada’s Ethics in Government Law, which requires (in short) that public officials refrain from voting on matters in which they have personal interests. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 6:53 am by Sam Glover
Read Should Supreme Court justices Google? [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 8:05 am by Gordon Smith
 One of many reasons I dislike reading Supreme Court opinions is that many of them read like they were written by law review editors.Do you have a citation for that? [read post]
13 May 2011, 3:33 pm by Victoria VanBuren
Justice Hecht delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Jefferson, Justice Wainwright, Justice Medina, Justice Green, Justice Johnson, Justice Willett, Justice Guzman, and Justice Lehrmann joined. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 3:53 pm by Lyle Denniston
  It is far from clear, however, whether or how the end of filibusters over judicial nominees might change the Supreme Court itself. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 6:09 pm by David Badertscher
It also mentions that “[Breyer] has written more than 525 Opinions  as a Supreme Court Justice…”. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 3:07 am by NCC Staff
As 2018 winds now, it was another memorable year for the Supreme Court. [read post]