Search for: "Other Interested Parties Amended"
Results 321 - 340
of 18,342
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2010, 7:53 am
Fourth-Party Data Brokers Using Fourth-Party Data Brokers To Bypass the Fourth Amendment on TechBlogger.org, referring to Buying You: The Government's Use of Fourth-Parties to Launder Data about 'The People' by Joshua L. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:15 am
You only need to look at China to see this. In China, the ruling communist party suppresses any views that don’t represent the “party line. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 8:27 am
The extent to which that power matters for purposes of the First Amendment and the extent to which that power could lawfully be modified raise interesting and important questions. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 10:53 am
[This may be especially helpful in cases involving sealing or pseudonymity, where the parties agree with each other but the public interest ought to be represented.] [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 11:06 am
In contrast, a Fourth Amendment seizure occurs when government conduct meaningfully interferes with an individual’s possessory interest in property. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 9:14 am
On July 1, 2016, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) approved, on an accelerated basis, proposed amendments to the listing rules of The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq”) to require Nasdaq-listed companies to disclose annually any “compensation” or “other payment” provided by third parties to directors or director-nominees in connection with their candidacy or service on the company’s board of directors. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 10:27 am
What Can We Learn from Other 4th Amendment Cases? [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 2:58 pm
The changes enhance the ability of secured parties to claim purchase-money security interests in inventory, and preserve purchase-money security interest status in a refinancing.The rules governing the transfer of collateral to buyers and others are rationalized and improved.A number of uncertainties in the rules that determine priorities between secured parties and other competing claimants are clarified so as to produce greater certainty and… [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 6:48 am
Far from being “good politics” or “good constitutional design,” the system led to rampant and blatant corruption, letting corporations and other moneyed interests effectively buy U.S. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 10:39 am
Although much digital ink will be spilled regarding the amendment’s application to lawyers—and we certainly emphasize here that potential sea change in AML regulation—the amendment’s application to third-party payment processors, depending upon how that term ultimately gets defined if the amendment becomes law, also could be a very significant development affecting many businesses and financial technology companies… [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 6:03 am
In passing judgment, the Court must determine not only the legitimacy and strength of each of those interests; it must also consider the extent to which those interests make it necessary to burden the plaintiff’s rights. [read post]
8 May 2023, 4:01 am
The other three cases post-date CPLR 5004’s amendment to 9%. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 3:47 pm
To provide remedies for parties who incur damages due to vexatious conduct or other unreasonable conduct during proceedings brought pursuant to Title 14, without infringing on the rights of individuals who are the subject of proceedings. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 2:22 pm
But the concept of “public rights” came to cover many private interests, because often one person will have a significant interest in how the government deals with another. [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 8:25 am
Typically, the party challenging the statute has the burden to establish its unconstitutionality. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 9:05 am
In addition, the amendments require a cooling-off period of at least 30 days for persons other than officers and directors of an issuer before any trading can commence under the trading arrangement or modification. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 7:00 am
In a published opinion filed August 14, 2023, the Third District Court of Appeal reversed a judgment that denied a petition for writ of mandate challenging the State Department of Public Health’s (Department) approval of Real Party in Interest Harm Reduction Coalition of Santa Cruz County’s (real party) needle exchange program. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 6:24 am
The DTLS amendments treat a third-party client’s failure to comply with such a request as a notice violation subject to damages or other penalties. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:22 am
CDA § 230(c)(1) immunizes search engines from most kinds of tort liability for publishing the third-party content of others, while CDA § 230(c)(2) protects their decisions to remove it. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:22 am
CDA § 230(c)(1) immunizes search engines from most kinds of tort liability for publishing the third-party content of others, while CDA § 230(c)(2) protects their decisions to remove it. [read post]
