Search for: "Oxley, in Re"
Results 321 - 340
of 475
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2009, 7:35 pm
They're two very different businesses. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 4:17 am
It's worth noting that Sarbanes-Oxley - adopted back in '02 - still hasn't been fully implemented even though we're up to our eyeballs in a new sea of regulatory reform. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 1:11 pm
FEC, the case from last term involving the constitutionality of McCain-Feingold that was re-argued on September 9. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 6:26 pm
If you're a whistleblower who has been retaliated against, you should contact a lawyer immediately as your claims are likely subject to strict legal filing deadlines. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 4:56 am
The SEC and Congress should re-examine these laws and ease up a bit to help keep our entrepreneurial culture going strong. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 4:15 am
This case involved claims by two former in-house lawyers under the whistleblower protection provisions of Sarbanes-Oxley. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
– unusually entertaining cases before the CAFC: Cornish v Doll (Patently-O) The Independent Inventor’s Handbook (IP Watchdog) US Patents – Decisions CAFC affirms that patent ownership (and standing) can vest through operation of law: Sky Technologies v SAP AG (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Property, intangible) CAFC en banc: Methods do not have exportable components and therefore method claims cannot be infringed under section 271(f):… [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 7:02 am
They're not suing Mr. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 12:48 pm
Some have described the ongoing financial crisis as reflecting poorly on US corporate governance, as with the accounting scandals and stock market bubbles of the late 1990s and early 2000s that led to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 1:00 pm
Below are links to some stories from the conference: Ex-SEC chief Pitt decries state of Sarbanes-Oxley and risk management By Alexander Howard, Associate Editor of SearchCompliance.com My Takeaways from Compliance Week 2009 by Bruce Carton of Enforcement Action Compliance Week 2009 Day 1 What a Difference a Year Makes by Francine McKenna of Re: The Auditors SEC's Aguilar on 404, IFRS Proxy Access, More by Melissa Klein Aguilar of The Filing Cabinet SEC Commish, FINRA Head:… [read post]
19 May 2009, 1:13 am
Whether they're looking for another view on a general issue of law, suggestions of best practices or insights into a vendor, in-house lawyers can find a powerful tool in social networks tailored to their needs. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 1:38 pm
In our paper, The Robustness of the Sarbanes Oxley Effect on the U.S. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 7:17 pm
As I detailed above, Patrick Byrne told Fox News, "We're profitable. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 8:09 am
First, of course, is the intellectual namesake and virtual godfather of the publication you're reading, Adam Smith himself. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 5:34 am
Here's the deal: Section 406 is a relatively obscure provision of Sarbanes-Oxley. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 8:00 am
We are discussing In re Citigroup. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 10:52 am
Top Ten Stories of the Week ending February 20, 2009: Law Practice Management Last Week's Layoffs Saved Law Firms an Estimated $100M Feb 17, 2009, 06:52 am CST Law Firms A&O to Ax Up to 250 Lawyers and 200 Staff, Freeze Pay and Ask Partners for Capital Feb 19, 2009, 11:54 am CST Layoffs Laid-Off Lawyer Competes with Other Attorneys for Paralegal Jobs Feb 17, 2009, 09:22 am CST Midyear Meeting 2009 76% of Young Lawyers Glad They're Attorneys, Study Finds Feb 14, 2009,… [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 9:40 am
The Friehling & Horowitz firm was not registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board ("PCAOB"), because of an overbroad exemptive rule (discussed below) that the SEC repeatedly adopted in the wake of Sarbanes-Oxley to spare broker-dealers that were not publicly held from the oversight of a PCAOB-registered auditor. 2. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 10:25 am
In In re Digimarc Corporation Derivative Litigation, 2008 WL 5171347 (9th Cir. [read post]
4 Jan 2009, 6:44 am
They're all politicians. [read post]
