Search for: "Oxley v. Oxley" Results 321 - 340 of 1,110
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2015, 7:11 pm by Sme
Perez, Dept. of Labor (10th Cir., May 29, 2015) (denying petition for review of Sarbanes-Oxley claim) [read post]
20 May 2015, 7:17 am by Joy Waltemath
Accordingly, the appeals court judgement was reversed and the trial court’s grant of summary judgment against the employee was reinstated (Shell Oil Co. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm
(Backer, Larry Catá, "The Sarbanes-Oxley Act: Federalizing Norms for Officer, Lawyer and Accountant Behavior. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 3:40 am by Broc Romanek
” And this blog from Steve about how the 2nd Circuit has upheld the SEC’s denial of a whistleblower award… Whistleblowers: DOL Adopts Final Rules The Department of Labor finally has gotten around to adopting final rules for whistleblower procedures as required by Section 806 of Sarbanes-Oxley, which reflects Dodd-Frank-imposed amendments and clarifies OSHA’s procedures for handling whistleblower claims. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 3:23 am by Broc Romanek
SCOTUS Interprets Sarbanes-Oxley Evidence Destruction Provisions This blog by Steve Quinlivan covers a Supreme Court case that makes it clear that Sarbanes-Oxley doesn’t apply to fish… – Broc Romanek [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 10:11 am by Calvin Massey
  So what can we learn from the Court’s decision in Yates v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 3:36 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court overturned a commercial fisherman’s conviction for violating the Sarbanes-Oxley Act’s anti-shredding provision. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:48 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday’s decision in Yates v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:15 am by David Markus
Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor joined her opinion.The opinion is U.S. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 1:12 pm by Mike Madison
That’s the Supreme Court of the United States, in Yates v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 12:54 pm by Walter Olson
Ilya Shapiro comments [link fixed now] on the Supreme Court’s ruling this morning in Yates v. [read post]