Search for: "P RODRIGUEZ" Results 321 - 340 of 511
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2012, 7:55 am by Lovechilde
Maloney (D-CT 5th), Robert Matsui (D-CA 5th), Karen McCarthy (D-MO 3rd),  Betty McCollum (D-MN 4th), Jim McDermott (D-WA 7th), James McGovern (D-MA 3rd),  Cynthia McKinney (D-GA 4th), Carrie P. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 9:19 am by Robert Chesney
Press inquiries regarding logistics should be directed to Pat Vaughan Tremmel at 847-491-4892 or p-tremmel@northwestern.edu. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 3:28 pm by Rick Hasen
Because lower courts are bound to follow this Court’s decisions until they are withdrawn or modified, however, Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 1:08 pm by Rick Hasen
Also noteworthy in this brief is that Texas alludes the the potential unconstitutionality of section 5, an issue not squarely presented in the case: “If any argument in this case is ‘extreme,’ NAACP Br. 24, or ‘absurd,’ Rodriguez Br. 28, it is Appellees’ argument (fully endorsed by the Texas court) that a district court has carte blanche to rewrite a duly enacted state law—and order elections to be conducted under that judicially drawn… [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 8:22 am by admin
(p. 472) Jane Larson could understand the harm of others, because she possessed a unique capacity for empathy. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 9:04 pm
Harding, 2010 UT App 8, 223 P.3d 1148 (2010): ¶1 The sole question before us is whether a police officer may search two backpacks belonging to a passenger in an automobile after receiving only the driver’s consent to search the vehicle. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:13 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
        In Re Service Corporation International (SCI) (Tex. 2011)      PER CURIAM OPINION OF THE TEXAS SUPREME COURT   This mandamus proceeding arises from an arbitration agreement governed by the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:13 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
        In Re Service Corporation International (SCI) (Tex. 2011)      PER CURIAM OPINION OF THE TEXAS SUPREME COURT   This mandamus proceeding arises from an arbitration agreement governed by the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 6:06 pm by JT
As Assignee of Raul Rodriguez v Country-wide Ins. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:00 am by Bexis
Ill. 1988) (“[p]laintiffs offer no evidence that [the prescriber] consulted the [drug’s] label at the time he prescribed”). [read post]