Search for: "P. v. Mai" Results 321 - 340 of 19,801
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2024, 11:12 am by Jennifer Brockel
District Court, 198 Colo. 251, 256, 598 P.2d 1038, 1041 (1979) (noting legislative purpose to prevent or remedy consumer fraud); Dunbar, 177 Colo. at 113, 493 P.2d at 668 (finding that state may enjoin deceptive practices “that have a tendency or capacity to attract customers” as a valid exercise of police power). [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 9:12 am by Marcel Pemsel
The fact that a trade mark might be – even primarily – understood as a promotional formula, does not mean that it cannot be perceived as an indication of origin (CJEU, Smart Technologies v OHIM, C-311/11 P, at para. 30). [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
If PMAC arbitral tribunals are prevented from seeking the correct interpretation of EU competition law from the CJEU, enforcement of PMAC arbitral awards may risk being refused on the ground of public policy – under Article V.2(b) of the New York Convention – every time EU competition law may have been infringed or misapplied. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 5:34 am by Rick Hasen
All the events of 2024 converge: The US supreme court’s likely ruling in Trump v Anderson denying Colorado’s… Continue reading The post “The US supreme court may turn this election into a constitutional crisis” appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 12:34 pm by Covington & Burling LLP
”  If a VoIP provider determines that a customer may be doing so, it must conduct an investigation to determine if a violation is being committed. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:07 am by Kevin LaCroix
In the following guest post, Dan Aronowitz, President of Encore [formerly Euclid] Fiduciary, examines the new lawsuit and assesses what it may represent. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 8:58 am by Giles Peaker
The Court of Appeal considered Aweys and R v Brent London Borough Council, ex p. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 10:28 pm by Josh Blackman
That day, a motion was made to add "[t]he [V]ice-President and other Civil officers of the U. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 4:24 am by Alessandro Cerri
 Further, the Court stated that it is an established principle of settled case-law that, as a general rule, the submission of facts and evidence by the parties remains possible after the expiry of the relevant time limits, and the EUIPO is not prohibited from taking account of such facts and evidence (mobile.de v EUIPO, C‑418/16 P).In this case, it was accepted by both parties that Mr Noah had submitted the first evidence of use of the Mark within the time limit set by… [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:27 am by Derek Muller
As ELB readers may recall, I flagged the Anderson issue back in October, and my briefing… Continue reading The post Trump v. [read post]