Search for: "PARTY CITY HOLDINGS, INC." Results 321 - 340 of 2,297
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The First District Court of Appeal reversed, holding that the Project, pursuant to SB 35 was eligible for ministerial review and approval, and to do so does not violate the City’s charter authority. [read post]
The First District Court of Appeal reversed, holding that the Project, pursuant to SB 35 was eligible for ministerial review and approval, and to do so does not violate the City’s charter authority. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 10:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Interestingly, the court didn’t hold that the registered LTTB marks were per se invalid—they could still be protectable if used on clothing tags. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 9:37 am by Eugene Volokh
& Cable Inc., 780 F.2d 340, 342 (3d Cir. 1986) (holding that even a rookie patrol officer is a public official). [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Fundraising Inc., a vendor that is under the Axiom Strategies corporate umbrella, announced it has “revamped the traditional PAC-focused GOP fundraising model” to an “updated approach … to better compete with Democrats for small-dollar donations. [read post]
Door Dash, Inc. filed a complaint in the Southern District of New York on Wednesday over a new ordinance the company says violates customer privacy. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
They both said they would invest the proceeds of their sales in diversified index funds or hold them in cash. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The justices said the state cannot limit political contributions to third-party groups because of the U.S. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 5:00 am by John Jascob
The parties jointly requested the Supreme Court recalendar oral argument and hold the proceedings in abeyance while the parties seek approval of the settlement by the Superior Court of California, where the underlying litigation is pending (Pivotal Software, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 7:14 am by John Jascob
Superior Court of California, City and County of San Francisco, August 2021).The question presented concerns Section 77z-1(b)(1) of the PSLRA, which provides, "In any private action arising under [the Securities Act of 1933], all discovery and other proceedings shall be stayed during the pendency of any motion to dismiss, unless the court finds, upon the motion of any party, that particularized discovery is necessary to preserve evidence or to prevent undue prejudice to that… [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Opposition party leaders decried the decision to hold an election at a time when public health officials have said the country is in a delta variant-fueled fourth coronavirus wave. [read post]