Search for: "PEOPLE v. FIELDS" Results 321 - 340 of 5,398
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2023, 8:54 pm by CoL .net
Lortie has more than 30 years of experience in the field of child protection. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 8:41 am by Eugene Volokh
The University of Chicago law school website shows 62 "full time reaching faculty" v. 127 "Lecturers in Law" (another—and, to some ears, a more dignified—term for adjuncts). [read post]
29 May 2023, 11:43 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
As Europeans, we would like to rejoice at the prospect of witnessing the EU progressing towards an “ever closer union among the peoples of Europe” with a unified patent law under a unitary title and  a jurisdiction with transnational competence for patent litigation. [read post]
29 May 2023, 7:15 am by Karina Lytvynska
This act of building upon what came before makes this type of art a challenging field for copyright. [read post]
22 May 2023, 6:47 am by Russell Knight
“[T]he general rule is that testimony of a witness’ opinion is not admissible into evidence” People v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 6:30 am by Sabina Henneberg
The Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project, which seeks to measure democracy globally, identified eight countries in 2022 that “bounced back” from authoritarianism after having previously made democratic gains. [read post]
15 May 2023, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
As he helped that field expand and thrive, he also felt compelled to point out the limitations of economic theory and methodology. [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:56 pm
 It is with that in mind that I take this opportunity to let people know that I have posted a new discussion draft, "Chinese State-Owned Companies and Investment in Latin America and Europe. [read post]
14 May 2023, 4:30 am by INFORRM
The African Commission on Human and Peoples’ RightWilliams v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 3:00 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
On (2), one had to conduct a multifactorial assessment based on all the circumstances of the case which included the relevant factors set out by David Stone in MEI Fields Designs Ltd v Saffron Cards and Gifts Ltd [2018] EWHC 132  (IPEC) as follows: (a) the terms of the contract of employment; (b) where the work was created; (c) whether the work was created during normal office hours; (d) who provided the materials for [read post]