Search for: "Page v. Miller" Results 321 - 340 of 1,003
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2008, 4:08 pm
Mary and Ernest Miller , a 6-page opinion, Judge Mathias writes:Mary D. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 5:13 am by UKSC Blog
symposium Volume 8 of the Yearbook features a symposium titled Firing the Brexit Bullet – Who Pulls the Article 50 Trigger with 8 contributions from prominent commentators who closely followed or were involved in the Article 50 (‘Brexit’) case, Secretary for Exiting the European Union v R (Miller) [2017] UKSC 5. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:18 am
Supreme Court's decision in Miller v. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 6:10 am by Blog Editorial
Special Preview: Lord Millett on Prerogative Power and Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty As mentioned above, Volume 7 of the Yearbook includes a short article written by Lord Millett concerning the upcoming Article 50/Brexit appeal (Miller v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union). [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 7:49 am by Dennis Crouch
Miller Waste Mills, Inc., 275 F.3d 1347, 1361 (Fed. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 5:55 am
  (Her reference to “General Miller” suggests that an Assistant Tennessee Attorney General was prosecuting the case.) [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 4:10 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://thinkipstrategy.com/subscribe/   Highlights this week included: UK passes Digital Economy Bill (Ars Technica) (TorrentFreak) (IP Watch) (1709 Copyright Blog) (Ars Technica) Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rules FCC had no right to sanction Comcast for P2P blocking (Ars Technica) (EFF) (Public Knowledge) (Public Knowledge) (TorrentFreak) (IP Spotlight) District… [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 11:35 am by Arthur F. Coon
  So it may be with the Fourth District Court of Appeal’s 43-page, published, 2-1 majority decision, accompanied by a 4-page dissent, filed on November 16, 2017, after remand from the California Supreme Court in Cleveland National Forest Foundation, et al. v. [read post]