Search for: "Parcell v. United States" Results 321 - 340 of 923
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2009, 12:35 am by Mark Murakami
He noted that the decision relied on "spurious historical assumptions," contemporaneous common law from England and the United States, and disregarded settled U.S. [read post]
28 May 2006, 10:11 pm
The master versions were created in the United States and sent abroad via disks and electronic transmissions. [read post]
31 May 2016, 9:20 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Because the federal government has defined the “waters of the United States” to include wetlands. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 3:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
(hereinafter the B & H law firm), to represent him in the prosecution of an action to recover damages for personal injuries he allegedly sustained in March 2005 while working for United Parcel Service due to an allegedly defective condition on a loading dock in Brooklyn. [read post]
Levine owned a parcel with an existing house and wanted to build two others and convert it to a planned unit development. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:03 am by Walter Olson
Thomas, United States District Court, E.D. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 10:53 am by Miriam Seifter
The question presented in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 12:57 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
No dice, held the court of appeals, in Lucas, "the United States Supreme Court held that in a takings case, where the property owner challenges a regulation as denying all economically beneficial or productive use of land, the regulatory action is 'compensable without a case-specific inquiry into the public interest advanced in support of the restraint.'" Slip op. at 9 (quoting Lucas v. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 6:24 am by Daniel J. Sargent
Three years later, Sei Fujii acquired a parcel of land in southern California. [read post]