Search for: "Parker v. State" Results 321 - 340 of 1,753
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2020, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
State Bar of Wisconsin. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 1:00 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Second Circuit (Sullivan, Chin and Parker [dissenting in part] says: Our case law is clear: 'it is not the proper role of courts to encourage nullification.' United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 12:12 pm by becassidy
Cleveland State Men’s Basketball at the Wolstein Center January 4 at 3pm v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 7:04 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Patty[Affirmed; Luckert; July 24, 2020]Prosecutorial error in closing argument (burden shifting)State v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 12:48 pm by Tom Zagorsky
Supreme Court decided to hear an appeal of a Ninth Circuit case, SEC v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 8:54 am by Ben
This judgment seems fallacious in relying on Walden v Fiore as this judgment doesn’t cover situations where the defendant has minimum contacts with the United States and any of the states within itself. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 10:25 am by Kym Stapleton
            The Washington Supreme Court recently held that "Hailey's Law" violates the state constitution (State v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 1:35 pm by Gordon Ahl, William Ford
Gerson; Kristy Parker, Counsel for Protect Democracy; GMU Professor Ilya Somin; and will be moderated by Lawfare Contributing Editor Carrie Cordero. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:57 am by Howard Knopf
 This current Copyright Board “2.0” is the 1989 replacement for Canada’s then 53-year-old internationally admired and exemplary Copyright Appeal Board “1.0”, which  established in 1936 as a result of the legendary 1935 report of the Parker Commission.The Copyright Appeal Board consisted of a judge and two public servants, all of whom served part time. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 2:33 pm by Robert Liles
  Despite the fact that the defendants supposedly learned of the State’s ongoing investigation, they allegedly: Directed employees to continue to bill for work that had not been performed. [read post]