Search for: "Patel v. State"
Results 321 - 340
of 532
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2022, 3:17 am
That opinion overturned Roe v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 5:48 pm
Gerlinger v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 7:23 pm
Gerlinger v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 7:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 2:07 am
The case of Wolf v Stadt Frankfurt Am Main heard before the European Court of Justice (ECJ) held that it was lawful for an upper age limit of 30 to be applied by the Federal state of Hesse in Germany on recruiting firemen. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 3:38 pm
Corns v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 11:52 am
In April 2010, the Government filed a superseding Indictment in U.S. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 11:52 am
In April 2010, the Government filed a superseding Indictment in U.S. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 5:57 am
Bank Markazi v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 11:53 am
In Patel v. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 7:40 am
22 articles in this issue The Possibility of a Uniform Legal Language at the Interplay of Legal Discourse, Semiotics and Blockchain Networks Pierangelo Blandino … [read post]
18 May 2022, 12:35 pm
Rohini Kurup and Katherine Pompilio posted the Supreme Court’s ruling in Patel v. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 3:13 pm
Patel, 2020 WL 6271056 (S.D. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 2:34 pm
The State of Punjab, AIR 1972 SC 1197; The Secretary, Hailakandi Bar Association v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 2:07 am
This appeal will consider whether the Court of Appeal erred in its application of the Patel v Mirza guidelines. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 10:02 am
It does not appear to address the more fundamental debate taking place on these issues.It is also perhaps worth recalling that the English courts recently strayed into this discussion (perhaps unknowingly) in Patel v Allos [2008]. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 8:42 am
Patel and involved the ability of local police to access guest register lists at hotels. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 4:41 pm
(City of Santa Cruz v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 2:00 am
The appeal considered whether the Court of Appeal erred in its application of the Patel v Mirza guidelines. [read post]
