Search for: "Pena v State"
Results 321 - 340
of 374
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2017, 7:57 am
In Sosa v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 9:42 pm
In Pena v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 10:11 am
Henceforth, Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:20 am
Previously in Regents of Univ of Cal v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 3:41 pm
See Mock v. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 10:44 am
Supreme Court Cases MEDELLIN v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 6:24 am
Agere Sys., Inc. (2009)), Seventh (EEOC v. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 4:03 pm
Its attorneys—hired by TSI on a state-by-state basis--never do that. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 2:52 pm
Gonzalez’s review The New Batson: Opening the Door of the Jury Deliberation Room after Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 1:43 am
Esa medida o canon comparativo, a su vez, permite examinar la relación delito-pena o infracción-sanción, en vistas a su proporción debida -con transcendencia constitucional, en lo que ahora importa-, desde varias perspectivas diferentes, pero compatibles entre sí. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 7:05 pm
Pena-Irala. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 2:54 pm
Pix credit Animal rights is not a conceit of developed states. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:01 am
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 4:28 pm
Under the standard set forth by the US Supreme Court in Adarand Constructors Inc v Pena (65 EPD ¶43,366 (1995)), to survive constitutional review, a government entity’s consideration of race has to meet strict scrutiny standards; thus, it must: (1) serve a compelling state interest; and (2) be narrowly tailored to achieve that interest. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 6:15 am
Under the standard set forth by the Supreme Court in Adarand Constructors Inc v Pena, to survive constitutional review, a government entity’s consideration of race has to meet strict scrutiny standards; thus, it must: (1) serve a compelling state interest; and (2) be narrowly tailored to achieve that interest. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 11:02 am
Other states are still a work in progress, though they have been moving toward embracing international standards: e.g., Paraguay. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 10:18 am
Colorado is cited in the following article: Jason Koffler, Laboratories of Equal Justice: What State Experience Portends for Expansion of the Pena-Rodriguez Exception Beyond Race, 118 COLUM. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 5:55 am
Impermissible outside influences include both attempts at witness tampering and juror animus, such as in Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 8:04 am
Pero hay valor en y vale la pena medir la temperatura y las trayectorias de las opiniones públicas del "sector informal". [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
: Kelly and another v GE Healthcare Ltd (IP finance) (Mis)appropriation of Wii and PlayStation brands to name medical disorders (IPKat) Is regulation of trade mark attorneys necessary? [read post]
