Search for: "People in Interest of PD" Results 321 - 340 of 413
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2009, 4:06 am
Supreme CourtPublic Citizen's Cert Petition of Public Interest for 1-9-09 Conf hereSCOTUSblog's Petitions to Watch for 1-9-09 Conf here; 1-16-09 Conf hereRoss Runkel's US Sup Ct Employment Law Cases - Pending & decided herePetition for Cert Granted:Crawford v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 5:25 am
To download a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: People v Mcgourty [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 10:56 pm
So I was interested to see the Senate Criminal Justice Committee Report's Fifth Interim Charge articulate the problem in more detail. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 8:01 pm by Dennis Wilkins
With interest, the long-term cost of each will be double the advertised price. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 6:40 am
Now that might make for a more interesting video. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 2:53 pm
Given this blog's past focus municipal graffiti policies (see below), I was interested to receive a copy of a press release from Rep. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 7:38 am
There's also the risk of snitches using police to further their own criminal interests rather than with an aim of reducing crime. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 5:30 pm
As it happens, a very similar though has occurred to a lot of people in connection with the somewhat analagous US Attorney firings. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 7:22 am
  But they found no room for a PD blawg in the Crime category. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 3:32 pm
Snitch rulesThe ACLU Blog of Rights not long ago published a blog post on several interesting subjects related to informants and snitching, including a discussion of " Pearson v. [read post]
30 Nov 2008, 6:24 am
  Half the comments were interesting. [read post]
23 Nov 2008, 6:23 am
  Tony's response is particularly interesting, as it combines both his rejoinder to Miriam's complaint as well as its own marketing opportunity. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
Rounds, 530 F.3d 724, 732 (8th Cir. 2008): 1) plaintiff was likely to prove any interest the state has in protecting funeral mourners from unwanted speech was outweighed by the First Amendment right to free speech; [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 8:54 pm by Sean Hayes
It is interesting to note that the privacy protected, in application of the right, is not only against violations by the government, but violations by private individuals. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 1:27 am
Of course, if management is authorized to sign their own checks, there may be an interest in continuing with collections of assessments and payment of [some] bills for awhile. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 11:16 pm
Do most people come home and watch a show, or read a book, that is exactly like their life all day? [read post]