Search for: "People of the State of California, ex rel." Results 321 - 340 of 424
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2011, 12:16 am by John Steele
            The Supreme Court reasoned that the approach was justified by prior precedents that had presumed that confidences are disclosed in the course of the attorney-client relationship (citing People ex rel. [read post]
19 May 2011, 12:20 am by Sam E. Antar
Judge Freeman granted the California District Attorney’s motion to compel Overstock.com to turn over the contact information of certain former employees (Download a copy of Court decision here): IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:The Motion of Plaintiff The People of the State of California (“Plaintiff”) to Compel Further Responses to First Set of Interrogatories is ruled on as follows:At issue are the responses of defendant Overstock.com, Inc. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 12:23 pm by Dawn Goulet, Associate
  Although the California Supreme Court noted that its decision in People ex rel. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 10:52 am
Mattel argued that the list of examples in the contract were illustrative not exclusive, but the Court held that "ideas" are "markedly different from the list of examples including discoveries, improvements and designs" (People ex rel Lungren v superior Court (1996)). [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 10:11 pm by Sam E. Antar
Rick Koerber, who is under indictment for alleged Ponzi scheme, with Patrick Byrne In law enforcement circles, there is a term known as the “three exes” for ex-lovers, ex-employees, and ex-business associates. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 10:25 am by Lawrence Cunningham
The purpose of the rule isn’t necessarily to insulate people from paying higher damages. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 3:05 pm by CJLF Staff
If passed, Illinois State Police would create an internet registry database of people convicted of first-degree murder, including information such as their names, residential addresses, and photographs. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 7:55 pm
I have no personal knowledge about either party's attorney beyond what Google searches of their names retrieve and what a review of the California State Bar website discloses. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 5:45 pm by Brad Pauley
  The oil company argued that the Supreme Court has implied a nonstatutory exception to the privilege in its decisions in People ex rel Clancy v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 4:24 pm by admin
 More than 800,000 people are currently listed on California’s child abuse index. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 12:31 pm by Jeff Gamso
  Fingers crossed.But while we await developments in the Land of Lincoln, it's time to head back to the Lone Star State where the Court of Criminal Appeals, to the likely-surprise of nobody, issued its opinion this morning in State ex rel Lykos v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:36 am by admin
  It means people know California’s going to default; they’re trying to minimize or hedge the losses to themselves from doing so. [read post]