Search for: "People v Court"
Results 321 - 340
of 61,207
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2007, 9:58 am
On Wednesday, the New York Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in People v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 1:20 pm
But how does one in fact apply the thing to people who've been in custody the whole time? [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 2:35 pm
Juror John V. himself was convicted of DUI by plea. . . . [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 9:30 pm
Over at the website of the UC Davis Law Review, you can find Gerald Leonard’s Fletcher v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 8:45 am
The day after the court in Texas issued a nationwide injunction, Texas and three other states followed up with a second lawsuit filed in the same court – the Franciscan Alliance v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 8:08 am
One such case that has come under scrutiny is People v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:20 pm
“Abortion Goes Back to the People; In Dobbs, the Supreme Court finally corrects its historic mistake in Roe v. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 12:20 pm
The post WILLIAM STEWART v. [read post]
19 Nov 2016, 12:01 am
In Beecher v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 6:46 am
In the wake of the Supreme Court's opinion in Michigan v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 10:44 am
Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument in Mayo v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 1:58 pm
The court ruled Thursday in People v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:12 am
STATE V. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 11:52 am
In 2010, the United States Supreme Court decided Padilla v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 4:38 pm
California courts have held that possession of multiple images of child pornography constitute only a single act of possession (People v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 9:09 am
LinkedIn The post Court Dissolves hiQ’s Injunction Against LinkedIn–hiQ v. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 1:51 am
Dennis Kozlowski and People v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 10:38 am
Some people really, really want to be in federal court instead of state court. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 6:56 pm
On Friday, September 25, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court denied leave to appeal in People v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 6:00 am
In People v. iMergent, Inc., ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Jan. 20, 2009), the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Six) upheld a preliminary injunction prohibiting the defendants from violating the UCL and the Seller Assisted Marketing Plan ("SAMP") Act (Civ. [read post]
