Search for: "People v Kennedy (Michael)" Results 321 - 340 of 387
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2010, 8:33 pm by Jeff Gamso
  I discussed it at length when the Supremes decided Caperton v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 12:45 pm by Amy Howe
Partisan identification, he told Bondurant, is not the only thing on which people base their votes. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:40 am by David Pozen
By contrast, Paul-Emile’s theory might suggest a revisionist reading of Gonzales v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 9:00 pm by John Dean
Several people who read my submitted statement found Michael’s material as fascinating as I did, so I have added it to my less-than-five-minute opener. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 9:35 pm by Domenic Powell
Supreme Court this term, Gundy v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 11:47 am
 But it was the "Lorenzo Jones" comment that set the tone for the entire argument in Bilski, et al., v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 3:34 am by SHG
Justice Kennedy writing for a plurality, has basically blessed the change, specifically stating in a 1991 decision, Gentile v State Bar of Nevada, that: An attorney’s duties do not begin inside the courtroom door. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
In a similar vein, Equifax has been fined £500,000 by the ICO (the press release can be found here and Equifax’s response here) for its failure to protect the personal data of over 15 million people in the UK following a breach in 2017. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 2:50 pm by Gideon
: On a similar note, Rick Horowitz writes today about freedom and why that’s not what’s killing people. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  They are literally the only people whose opinions genuinely count in his version of the law. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
In more recent years that was Justice Sandra Day O’Connor and then Kennedy. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm by Amy Howe
Casey, the 1992 decision reaffirming Roe v. [read post]