Search for: "People v Levelle" Results 321 - 340 of 12,171
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2010, 7:00 am by Glenn Cohen
My main interest in the case is how it will compare to Abigail Alliance v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 11:35 am
  Think again.Three people rob a person of his wallet and necklace at gunpoint. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm by Robichaud
This difficult categorization is largely artificial yet it sets out to illustrate that many of the factors applicable to these high-profile cases are not applicable at lower level cases, as well as other factors that are not applicable to the higher-level proceedings that have tremendous influence at the lower levels. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 2:54 pm by Jeff Redding
Justice Kennedy’s majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 6:15 am by Brian Shiffrin
We therefore substitute our own discretion, " even in the absence of an abuse [of discretion],' " and we modify the order by determining that defendant is a level two risk (People v Smith, 30 AD3d 1070, 1071, quoting Matter of Von Bulow, 63 NY2d 221, 224; see People v Brewer, 63 AD3d 1604). [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 3:56 am
First, the search giant's newest feature, Street View, part of its Google Maps application that adds street-level photographs, came under fire for its potential to show people in compromising situations, such as smoking or exiting porno shops. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm by Robichaud
This difficult categorization is largely artificial yet it sets out to illustrate that many of the factors applicable to these high-profile cases are not applicable at lower level cases, as well as other factors that are not applicable to the higher-level proceedings that have tremendous influence at the lower levels. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 9:01 am by Joe Consumer
There's been a lot of analysis of the disastrous impact of the Supreme Court's 5 to 4 Concepcion v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 9:01 am by Joe Consumer
There's been a lot of analysis of the disastrous impact of the Supreme Court's 5 to 4 Concepcion v. [read post]
13 Dec 2014, 12:35 am by Jon Gelman
Flanking them were James Sherk, also of the Heritage Foundation, and William Messenger, the attorney from the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation who argued Harris v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 6:50 pm by Ted Frank
Tags: Chicago, discrimination law, disparate impact, EEOC, police, testing Related posts October 21 roundup (1) May 14 roundup (2) January 12 roundup (4) Deep pocket files: Yong Huang v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 5:35 am by Jessica Smith
A number of criticisms have been leveled at application of the third-party doctrine to the kinds of digital information at issue in Carpenter. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:41 am by MATHILDE GROPPO
As a result of these decisions, it is clear that the bar has been raised to a level where trivial cases are not permitted to proceed. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 9:03 pm
In both People v Martin (2008 NY Slip Op 07281 [10/3/08]) and People v Dickerson(2008 NY Slip Op 07310 [10/3/08]) the certificate inaccurately reflected the length of the sentence imposed.Finally, in People v Bassett (2008 NY Slip Op 07729 [10/3/08]) the certificate listed a higher level offense than that for which the defendant had been convicted. [read post]