Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,803
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2013, 4:30 am
O’Connor, Francis V., ed. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 1:00 am
Lord Sumption again placed weight on the Virgós-Schmit Report. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 12:00 pm
Of course, we all have heroes or people who we truly admire in every profession. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 1:31 am
Core Issues Trust, R (On the Application of) v Transport for London & Another [2014] EWCA Civ 34 is a fascinating ruling of the Court of Appeal, England and Wales (Lord Dyson MR, Lord Justice Briggs and Lord Justice Christopher Clarke) since it isn't an intellectual property case at all, but has the potential to raise so many IP issues. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 8:06 am
R (o.t.a A and B) v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 2:27 pm
The latest chapter of the “Brand Owners v Counterfeiters” saga seems again to be playing out in favour of brand owners, with last week’s decision of a Paris District Court holding eBay responsible for facilitating the sale of counterfeit Louis Vuitton products. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 9:36 am
In Runa Begum v Tower Hamlets [2003] 2 AC 430, Lords Bingham and Millett had made pretty scathing comments on the lawfulness of contracting out the review function – Lord Bingham (at [10]) had “very considerable doubts” whether it was a function; and Lord Millett agreeing pointed out that the SI was “concerned in very general terms with deregulation and the subcontracting of ordinary local authority… [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 12:40 am
There is a four day hearing in the Privy Council: Cukurova Finance International Ltd and Anor v Alfa Telecom Turkey Ltd will be heard by Lords Neuberger, Mance, Kerr, Clarke and Sumption from Monday 22 October until Thursday 25 October 2012. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 9:59 pm
Lord Justice Carnworth said: 36. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
The House of Lords held that the words were not capable of referring to him. [read post]
5 May 2010, 8:16 am
Abacus made it possible for more people to gamble on mortgages for no productive gain or loss. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 6:46 am
The Court of Appeal decision The lead judgment, with which Lord Justices Phillips and Moylan agreed, was given by Lord Justice Males. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 3:47 am
As was stated by Lord Justice Gibson in Asprey & Garrard Ltd v WRA (Guns) Ltd: "...the defence has never been held to apply to names of new companies as otherwise a route to piracy would be obvious". [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 2:45 pm
Including some things that I have to do.Now, thank the Lord, the reality is that even those days are usually not crushingly burdensome. [read post]
12 Mar 2016, 8:23 am
It was by Lord Donaldson in 1981: “No particular form of award is required. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 12:56 pm
Cameron would never flick a V sign at the people of Britain) And on this momentous day for Egypt… Lord Sugar tweets away…. you..really…could not make it up… I haven’t even got the will to use Lord Sugar’s catchphrase in a post mubarka-ironic way…. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 12:31 am
He has found very few people to agree with this view, however, because usually he receives back the mantra "claims have to be construed the same for infringement as for patentability". [read post]
19 May 2016, 3:22 am
The Court of Appeal judgment In his leading judgment in the Court of Appeal Lord Justice Jackson said that “the court should not make orders which are ineffective” and it would be “inappropriate…for the court to ban people from saying that which is common knowledge. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 11:39 am
Courts Ruling: § 93A, Breach Of Contract, and Willful Violation Causation Under § 93A Examining Lord v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 7:04 am
If the same team of people was used to determine the question in Article 56, however, the effect would be to make the invention immediately obvious. [read post]
