Search for: "People v Reader"
Results 321 - 340
of 6,602
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2023, 6:00 am
Rabia Belt's remarks may be of particular interest to readers of this blog. [read post]
15 May 2023, 9:30 pm
An example is Ciraolo v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 6:15 am
White v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 5:01 am
What about people like me? [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:00 pm
First, some readers claim that we made technical errors in parsing the precise language of the relevant statutes. [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:00 am
For the Balkinization symposium on Julie Suk, After Misogyny: How the Law Fails Women and What to Do about It (University of California Press, 2023).Julie SukMany thanks to Jack Balkin for hosting this symposium on After Misogyny: How the Law Fails Women and What to Do about It, and to Paula Monopoli, Deborah Dinner, Victoria Nourse, Katharine Young, and Linda McClain for their comments and questions which are as generous as they are challenging. [read post]
12 May 2023, 5:53 am
Readers may recall the decision in State v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 3:00 am
The AmeriKat has given you the Reader's Digest version below, but if you want to get into the detail the judgment is agitating with facts. [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:00 am
EFF and the ACLU of Northern California filed a lawsuit, called Williams v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 9:30 pm
(OI, v.1, 331). [read post]
10 May 2023, 2:30 pm
From Collins v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am
I want the reader to be able to quickly find the answers to the questions they have about law because I expect it to be used by people bound by tight deadlines. [read post]
8 May 2023, 9:30 pm
He reports with apparent gratification that “all across the country, people began expressly working on building incentives into legal rules” (OI, v.1, 332). [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm
Here, the reader will find fewer “lessons learned” from great mentors (although plenty of colorful and affectionate anecdotes). [read post]
4 May 2023, 5:16 am
The missing parties in Gonzalez and Taamneh are readers and speakers. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decision last year in Dobbs v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:30 am
Photographs are included in the judgment, and readers may agree with its description by Hodge Ch. as “ghastly, poorly constructed from flimsy materials, and entirely out of keeping with the simplicity of the rest of the sanctuary area [29]”. [read post]
1 May 2023, 4:00 am
After all, Roe v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 3:30 am
There is another UK judge with a dual antitrust/patent focus many of my readers know--and some even personally know as a former colleague (patent litigator)--Mr. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 6:08 am
" Do people still read John Barth? [read post]
