Search for: "People v Rodriguez" Results 321 - 340 of 612
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2017, 8:16 am
Rodriguez–Linares, 143 So.3d 1070, 1071 (Fla. 2d District Court of Appeals 2014) (concluding that sending more than 300 emails to the petitioner constituted evidence of stalking); Bacchus v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:16 am by Jeralyn
That moment when the character of the stop changes from a traffic stop to a criminal inquiry is called the "Rodriguez moment", after the 2015 Supreme Court decision in Rodriguez v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 4:39 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Meza-Rodriguez, the Seventh Circuit created a circuit split by holding that the Second Amendment, which provides that “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed,” protects illegal aliens with “extensive ties” to the United States. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 6:48 am
Rodriguez's lawyers intend to take the case next to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 12:48 pm by Karen Gullo
v=POwrbFrJADU Briefing highlights: Katitza Rodriguez, Policy Director for Global Privacy, EFF One big issue we're facing is that there isn't an effective global system in place to make sure human rights are enforced. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 3:36 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed at Newsweek, Alida Garcia warns that “[ICE] admits it is reopening previously closed removal cases of DACA recipients, [which] could allow [the agency] to start detaining and deporting people as quickly as possible if the Supreme Court gives it the green light” in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 7:48 pm by Marty Lederman
 (When it later moved the INS from the Department of Justice to DHS, Congress transferred this and other authorities from the Attorney General to the DHS Secretary.)When the Texas v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 7:00 am by Ruth Levush
In 1993, in a 5-4 decision in Rodriguez v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 7:00 am by Ruth Levush
In 1993, in a 5-4 decision in Rodriguez v. [read post]