Search for: "People v Trump" Results 321 - 340 of 4,622
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2015, 9:12 pm by Joseph Fishkin
 They assumed that the meaning of the Commerce Clause in NFIB v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 3:56 am by Lyle Denniston
In that ruling, the Court said that Congress lacked the general power to inquire into people’s private lives. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 1:55 am by Justin Hendrix
He launched a political action committee dedicated to Trump’s reelection. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 5:50 am by jonathanturley
The clause was created in reference to a real Civil War in which over 750,000 people died in combat. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 6:58 am by Josh Douglas
Most urgent among these are lawsuits against the efforts of Republican legislatures to suppress voting by minorities, young people and others who... [read post]
28 May 2025, 5:01 am by Steven Calabresi
Three people deserve great credit for this enormous victory in a campaign to get Humphrey's Executor overturned that has lasted for 39 years. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
First, he mentions the US Supreme Court’s “with all deliberate speed” language from what has become known as Brown II, the Court’s follow-up to its groundbreaking Brown v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
It was the criminal theory itself that seemed crafted around the standard for obscenity famously described by Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart in the case of Jacobellis v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 10:01 am by Angela Mauroni
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has stated that the lawsuit, Innovation Law Lab v. [read post]
Legally, opponents of the administration’s stance sometimes cite the 2020 Supreme Court decision Bostock v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 9:51 am by Staff Writer
  In 1994, RICO charges were successfully brought up against pro-life activists in NOW v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 12:57 pm by Global General Counsel
They held that such a prohibition cannot be justified either in light of the objective of protecting intellectual property rights or by the objective of encouraging the public to attend football stadiums.Judgment in Cases C-403/08 and C-429/08Football Association Premier League and Others v QC Leisure and Others Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 5:15 am by SHG
Does that make us horrible people? [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 3:35 pm by Howard Wasserman
Flake's words about Donald Trump and the rhetorical threat he poses to free-speech and republican values. [read post]