Search for: "People v Webster" Results 321 - 340 of 428
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2011, 3:47 pm by Lara
Trademark Ownership Showdown Burning Man’s Burning Marks Trademark Attorney Ponders Parody — Yankees v Evil Enterprises [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
But using history appropriately is about more than finding nice sounding quotes from important people. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 8:29 pm by TDot
” Which brings me to the 2nd prong of this analysis: people have known law schools were juicing their employment statistics for most of the past decade. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 9:02 pm by Ryan McKeen
I looked at cases involving the Hartford Whalers, various cases about people hitting each other with hockey sticks, and Jaworski v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 11:04 am by Brad Pauley
Degrate (2005) 35 Cal.4th 1111, 1121-1122 [“When attempting to ascertain the ordinary, usual meaning of a word, courts appropriately refer to the dictionary definition of that word”];  People v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 6:25 pm
Alaska’s Court of Appeals is no different, as demonstrated by its recent decision in Bates v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 11:10 am by Larry Ribstein
The Supreme Court has issued yet another preemption opinion in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 7:54 am by Susan Brenner
It is defined by one dictionary as `having the capability, property, or effect of destroying.' Webster's Third New International Dictionary 615 (unabr. ed. 2002). [read post]
22 May 2011, 4:34 am by The Legal Blog
"In Websters dictionary also the word `reside' finds a similar meaning, which may be gainfully extracted: "1. [read post]
10 May 2011, 3:34 pm by Lyle Denniston
  When the Court turned to the second case, Virginia v. [read post]