Search for: "People v. Adler"
Results 321 - 340
of 449
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2013, 8:10 am
People like Randy Barnett, David Kopel, and Jonathan Adler were prominent constitutional federalism scholars, and could not easily be dismissed as mere partisan hacks. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 9:24 am
Adler) This morning, U.S. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 2:10 pm
Preventing would-be criminals from owning guns prevents them from shooting people. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:40 am
(Ilya Somin) A little over a year has passed since the Supreme Court’s momentous decision in NFIB v. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 9:01 am
H/T Jonathan Adler at VC. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 5:33 am
In a decision akin to that delived by the Court of Appeal, a Queensland Magistrate has helped set out the test for domestic violence cases under that State's Domestic and Family Violence Protection Act 2012. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:32 am
He discusses those views and Fisher v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 6:18 am
Peter Krouse of The Plain Dealer reports on a talk by Jonathan Adler in which he discussed the same-sex marriage cases and the challenge to race-based affirmative action in public universities in Fisher v. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Sackett v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 9:21 pm
That's the Court's square holding in New York v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 2:43 pm
That's the Court's square holding in New York v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 6:30 am
As Jonathan Adler and Michael Cannon have demonstrated, the text of the ACA provides for premium support subsidies only on purchases made through exchanges that the states establish. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 8:19 am
(Of course, many thought the same thing about NFIB v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 8:52 am
Adler) This morning NRO posted an article I co-authored with Nathaniel Stewart on the limited doctrinal implications of the Supreme Court’s decision in NFIB v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 9:33 am
Jonathan Adler has previously suggested that such conditions may pose constitutional problems. [read post]
21 May 2012, 9:43 am
” The Supreme Court ruled that it was in Bennis v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:04 am
Rather, the parallel is that there is sentiment among people who otherwise recognize a strong role for national government–as four of the five conservatives on the current Court surely do–that despite past precedents granting a broad commerce power, a significant role for state and local governance must be preserved. (3) Koppelman suggests that Jonathan Adler and I think argue that child labor “isn’t so bad. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 12:55 pm
” That’s what courts have done since Marbury v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 8:53 am
Lopez, New York v. [read post]
