Search for: "People v. Alexander"
Results 321 - 340
of 844
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2015, 12:11 pm
Sch. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 4:28 am
And on that page, you'll see the name he uses on Skype which, like e-mail, is a way to correspond with people over the Internet.Azmadeuz. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
The “governed”—the American people (“We the people”)—accept the system and process. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 4:05 am
That change is visible within the apex organs of the contemporary state system ((Text of A/ES-11/L.1; UN General Assembly Resolution -- "Aggression against Ukraine"; UKRAINE v. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 4:20 am
They commonly felt it a privilege, or even a responsibility, to speak up against the violence they have witnessed against the Palestinian people. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 12:05 pm
From Perlot v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 8:45 am
With regard to Hamilton Uptown, LLC v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 10:56 am
Alexander, et al. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 5:17 pm
Richardson, K5277 .T47 2009 v. 1 and v. 2 at Classified Stacks, publisher's page What's that? [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:42 pm
(disclosure - the author represented the Grosz heirs in Grosz v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 12:43 pm
" -- Notes by Edward Gordon Vázquez Menchaca, Fernando (1512-1569). [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 2:06 pm
" It was Justice Cardozo in 1926, then chief judge of the New York Court of Appeals, in People v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 7:35 am
Board of Education there was Mendez v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 10:56 am
Alexander, et al. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 8:08 pm
Alexander, et al. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 3:52 pm
Footnotes [1] More recently in United Housing Foundation v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 3:20 pm
Alexander, No. 07-1758 A sentence for possessing crack cocaine with the intent to distribute is affirmed where: 1) the district court did not commit a plain error in designating defendant a career offender for sentencing purposes as he committed a prior crime of violence, and he otherwise satisfied the criteria necessary to be considered a career offender; and 2) the sentence was otherwise reasonable. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 9:00 pm
It came during oral arguments in the case of United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 3:45 am
The concept made sense back in 1984, when the Supreme Court held in Chevron v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 8:54 pm
; and Calder v. [read post]
