Search for: "People v. Clayton" Results 321 - 340 of 414
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2010, 3:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
The difference in presenting data to a jury v. to a judge is a big one. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Of course, there is the reality that the Constitution was designed by people who were profoundly antagonistic to the notion of “democracy” inasmuch as that required some genuine faith in the capacity of ordinary people to engage in what Federalist 1 described as “reflection and choice” about how we should in fact be governed. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am by David Kopel
Michigan J. of Law Reform 175 (2013) (with Clayton Cramer and Joseph Olson). [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 9:05 pm by Max Masuda-Farkas
Supreme Court’s ruling in Bostock v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:49 am by John Elwood
People who owned such weapons before the effective date of the law are permitted to retain them, subject to some geographic restrictions on use; otherwise, possession is a crime. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 9:45 pm by Katelynn Catalano
The Education Department’s announcement comes a year after Bostock v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 4:05 pm
IPKat team member Jeremy is known to be a keen supporter of MARQUES, the association of European trade mark owners, practitioners and people who really appreciate a decent social programme when they see one. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
That’s something courts have been concerned about for quite some time – for instance, here’s a quote from the 1st Circuit’s 1992 decision in Milton v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:49 am
The only people to have colleges named after them in both Oxford and Cambridge are Jesus, St John, Wolfson ... and CATS! [read post]