Search for: "People v. Cross"
Results 321 - 340
of 6,088
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2017, 6:36 pm
The resulting landmark decision of Loving v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:01 am
From Troutt v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 10:09 am
People v. [read post]
25 Dec 2013, 6:16 am
But under cross-examination, [he] conceded he was unsure how much time passed before Peoples entered. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 9:20 am
Relying on the concurring opinions in United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:06 am
Their position was analogous to that of the claimant in Burnip v Birmingham City Council, who herself required overnight care. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 6:15 am
Case citation: GiveForward, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 10:33 am
Case citation: Jones v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 9:45 am
From the case Commil v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 12:02 pm
In Resch v. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 5:09 am
In Church of the Holy Cross v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 9:41 pm
The trial court relied upon People v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:11 am
Cross-published at Tech Policy Press. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 12:25 pm
In People v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 9:19 am
" Furthermore, how do we know when we cross the "sufficiently substantial" risk of bias line? [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court’s latest foray into this area is Merck v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 1:06 pm
Coupled with the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Illinois v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 11:44 am
State v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 12:52 pm
When in response to the prosecutor's question, the main prosecution witness falsely testified that she had received no benefit for he testimony, the prosecutor did not correct this "misstatement" as required (see People v Novoa, 70 NY2d 490, 496-498; People v Hendricks, 2 AD3d 1450, 1451, lv denied 2 NY3d 762; People v Potter, 254 AD2d 831, 832).2. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 8:36 am
(see, e.g., Playboy v. [read post]
