Search for: "People v. Cross" Results 321 - 340 of 5,674
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2011, 2:10 pm
Zeininger´s defense argued that the Constitution´s Sixth Amendment gives people the right to cross-examine the witnesses against them and also referred to a United States Supreme Court case, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 12:42 pm
 However, the parties will have to await the decision in the Actavis v Sanofi reference before they can see what the future of their case looks like. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 5:49 am by Matthew Weybrecht
One of the most famous and compelling defenses of the unitary executive comes from Justice Antonin Scalia’s dissent in Morrison v. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 3:30 am by Eboni Nelson
Duncan Kennedy, The Bitter Ironies of Williams v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 7:20 am
In many cases people do this without really understanding the consequences of what they are doing.The problems of using joint tenancies with children are again illustrated in a recent British Columbia case, Turner v. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 2:24 pm by lennyesq
This holding conflicts with a recent ruling of the Colorado Supreme Court, People v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
By contrast, if police took a statement in violation of Miranda, the statement would be inadmissible in the government’s affirmative case but admissible on cross-examination of the defendant, under Harris v. [read post]