Search for: "People v. District Court of State"
Results 321 - 340
of 14,676
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2017, 12:34 pm
In an unsigned, per curiam opinion, the Court granted certiorari in both IRAP v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 6:12 am
As a Miami-Dade burglary criminal defense attorney, I was interested to read a recent ruling from the state appeals court that serves South Florida, the Third District Court of Appeal. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 1:54 pm
In the case of San Antonio Independent School District v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 7:46 am
State v. [read post]
2 May 2017, 8:10 am
State v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:05 pm
The state of Washington just won summary judgment on remand in the Doe v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 10:49 am
The court of appeals reasoning below basically held that a teacher could be fired for doing anything not work related during the school day, even if at lunch: The Court of Appeals first deviated from our stated rule in Clarke in Sauter v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 4:13 pm
District of Columbia v. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 4:00 pm
District Court in San Jose last year. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 6:10 pm
Alabama: In People First v. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 11:54 am
In People of the State of California, et al. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 4:39 am
However, that decision was overturned by Florida's Fifth District Court of Appeal. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 8:47 am
See People for the Ethical Treatment of Property Owners v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
The court concluded that the state has a compelling interest in ensuring that people know whether or not they are receiving care from licensed professionals. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 9:18 am
People seem to forget that the Court has no deadline for hearing cases on its docket, as demonstrated by the fact that it took more than five years to decide Martinez v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 3:42 am
Cook, the court reached that conclusion unanimously; ten years later, in State v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 9:12 am
After oral argument, the outcome in Henderson v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 6:06 am
Thus, the district court’s ruling in Biden v Texas should have (at most) bound the federal government only in Texas and Missouri, in keeping with the court’s modest role as one district court granting relief to the parties before it. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 7:37 am
State v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 9:07 am
Judge Sri Srinivasan, writing for a three judge panel in Simon v. [read post]
