Search for: "People v. Givens"
Results 321 - 340
of 17,528
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2021, 8:37 pm
” Contreras did not ejaculate. . . .J. eventually got out of the bed and ran out of the house wearing only the t-shirt Brittany had given her; she was not wearing pants. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 12:03 pm
Woods had given Brittany two computer memory sticks and asked her to destroy them. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 12:43 pm
Especially given the underlying physical symptoms: "The supervising nurse practitioner who performed Marco’s sexual assault exam two to three hours after his 911 call testified Marco had an actively bleeding anal laceration—a “fairly significant injury. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 8:51 am
Does that mean the individual should be given more of something-like-privacy when in public? [read post]
19 Mar 2016, 1:24 pm
People v. [read post]
19 Mar 2016, 1:24 pm
People v. [read post]
1 Oct 2024, 11:40 am
Case Citation: Doe I v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 6:30 am
If McCulloch v. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 4:42 pm
They'll say anything.(3) Given (2), trial courts should think a ton about appointing a neutral expert. [read post]
7 May 2014, 8:36 pm
The subject has been much on my mind in the last two or three days while reading and commenting on Town of Greece v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 8:48 pm
Ruling jointly along with United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 6:54 pm
In Farina v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 10:08 am
Maybe with a "active chasing" exception, though I'm not entirely positive about that given the seemingly absurd consequences described above that might follow from such a holding.But then I read this case. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 12:27 am
Those of us who take the Fourth Amendment seriously, with its "right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects" from search and seizure, were dismayed by the Supreme Court's recent ruling in Florence v. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 12:34 pm
Justice Haller disagrees, but Justice McIntyre has the better of the argument, in my view, given the text, structure, history, and purpose of the exception.That's all one needs to decide the case, since each of the requirements of Section 1370(a) need to be satisfied in order for the statement to be admitted. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 8:26 pm
Some people who have been reading this blog know that I have been waiting for the decision in Evans v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 3:10 pm
Heather’s Legal Summaries: R v Trinchi, 2019 ONCA 356 R v Trinchi is the most recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision in a string of cases related to the offence of voyeurism under s. 162(1) of the Criminal Code (see our previous post on the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in R v Jarvis). [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 11:15 am
OPM and the unconstitutional conditions argument in Mass v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 4:59 am
Frye and Lafler v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 6:55 pm
Rippy v. [read post]
