Search for: "People v. Jennings"
Results 321 - 338
of 338
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2008, 11:11 pm
ENRON CORP. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 3:44 pm
"Whether those people, on both sides, agree with what the Supreme Court was going to do or not, didn't mean they didn't see it coming. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
: (IP finance), Technical assistance a key point of discussion at TRIPS Council: (Intellectual Property Watch), WIPO turmoil as new DG’s future comes under threat: (IAM), WIPO to host inter-regional forum to explore strategies to enhance development and service-orientation of IP offices: (WIPO), Controversy over lack of transparency and overreaching enforcement provisions in ACTA: (Spicy IP), (Spicy IP) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands World anti-counterfeiting day:… [read post]
18 May 2008, 7:49 am
Jennings, 2008 Ore. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, February 07, 2008 US v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 7:53 am
Jennings
Securing Liberty in the Face of Terror: Reflections from Criminal JusticeLucia Zedner
Civil Liberties in WartimeGeoffrey R. [read post]
1 Jan 2008, 8:23 am
People v. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 7:49 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 11:32 am
State v. [read post]
Texas' new sex offender law misplaces focus on stranger danger, could make victimization more likely
21 Oct 2007, 11:25 pm
"Unfortunately, the majority of sex crimes involve people like 'Uncle Jimmy,' " he said, "and Uncle Jimmy's not a monster. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 1:06 am
Jennings U.S. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 1:19 pm
People v Jennings, 2007 NY Slip Op 3028, 2007 N.Y. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 9:41 am
After Justice Lemuel Shaw's decision in Stebins v. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 6:23 pm
The recent Parker v. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 11:01 pm
Let's try to keep our eye on the larger issue -- that for five years, the Bush Administration has kept people imprisoned without a trial and without a reliable basis to believe that the vast majority of them are terrorists. [read post]
1 Jan 2007, 8:20 pm
The case shows up in a database used by lawyers, but as Confidential v. [read post]
31 Dec 2006, 9:06 pm
Jim suggests we drop in on a former student of his, Jen Burke, at Transcending Gender, who insists we all go downtown to watch the Mummers Parade. [read post]
17 Dec 2006, 9:49 pm
See Eugene Volokh's post on Rahmani v. [read post]
