Search for: "People v. Juvenile Court" Results 321 - 340 of 1,131
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2017, 9:56 am by CJLF Staff
  Alanna Durkin Richer of the Associated Press reports that a Maryland judge rejected Malvo's claim that he was entitled to be re sentenced because of the Supreme Courts 2012 holding in Miller v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 3:00 am by Giesela Ruehl
Moreover, the jurisdiction of family courts has to be defined carefully – for example, regarding the question of whether matters of juvenile delinquency and succession matters are to be handled by family courts (section IV.2.). [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 8:57 am by Liisa Speaker
Michigan Court of Appeals, in People v Killich, No. 329941, held that the Juvenile Code doesn’t allow for the imposition of a flat rate probation supervision fee, and vacated the trial court order imposing the fee and remanded for a corrected order of disposition.FACTS: Respondent Taylor Killich, a juvenile, pled no contest to a juvenile petition and was placed on probation for three months. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 9:00 am
As a prominent constitutional law scholar, Norman persuaded the Supreme Court to extend due process protections to juvenile proceedings (In re Gault, 1967) and to recognize equal protection rights for non-marital children (Levy v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 3:22 am by Scott Bomboy
In later years, the Court has excluded certain classes of people from capital punishment, including the mentally handicapped and juveniles. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 4:25 am by Edith Roberts
In Time, Thomas Wolf observes that the court’s ruling in Gill v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am by John Elwood
For people who have been watching the recent North Carolina election cases like Harris v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 8:33 am by Supreme People's Court Monitor
Commercial law 14 situations where the corporate veil can be pierced Criminal law Public security v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court granted review in the still-pending class-action case Microsoft v. [read post]