Search for: "People v. Kagan"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,730
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2024, 10:44 am
Anderson, Fischer v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 4:17 pm
Today, in Vega v. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 11:25 am
In Lamone v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 9:34 pm
Thus did Justice Scalia insert the word in 2010’s Rent-A-Center v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 10:01 pm
See Shager v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 10:04 am
And Kagan emphasized the importance of stare decisis to prevent people from thinking that the Supreme Court is a political institution. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 8:20 am
Ginsburg and Kagan questioned the state’s argument for reliance, noting that the state seemed to be saying it was relying on precedent to infringe other people’s rights. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
v. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 12:00 pm
Justice Kagan expressed the view that people who had false information about them disseminated online “would feel as though they had some interest that had been invaded. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 7:32 am
Similarly, in U.S. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 7:40 pm
Justice Kagan pressed Mooppan repeatedly to give a yes or no answer this question, but he resisted doing so. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
” A reading of the Court’s opinion in West Virginia v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 10:07 am
On Wednesday in Robertson v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:17 pm
” Kagan asked. [read post]
27 May 2024, 8:58 pm
I put up a short post on the argument in Smith v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 8:57 pm
And we do have in the common law this notion that people are held responsible for the fraud of agents. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 5:14 pm
” Justice Kagan interjects: “That’s so romantic. [read post]
12 May 2010, 6:50 pm
” Kathleen Parker, at the Washington Post, questions whether Kagan adheres to “Obama’s ordinary-people principle,” arguing that Kagan “can’t be characterized as anything close to mainstream America. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 10:24 am
Because if that means something, I suppose it means that after that statutory period of 20 limited years people can use that intellectual property for free. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:36 am
In Abood v. [read post]
