Search for: "People v. Kent" Results 321 - 340 of 627
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am by John Elwood
Kent Recycling Services, LLC v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:43 am by INFORRM
On 1 May 2024, the High Court handed down judgement in the data protection case of McLoughlin v Chief Constable of Kent Police [2024] EWHC 990 (KB). [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 9:38 am by Jeff Gamso
  He may be crazy, but legal crazy is something different.Of course, some people think the legal standards are just fine. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 10:04 am by Steve Hall
Earlier coverage of Justice Breyer's dissent in Valle v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 9:05 am by Jeff Gamso
*********On Tuesday, as you know, in United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 10:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Any general claims about distinctiveness must take into account: eligibility for protection/scope of protection; reality v. policy; words v. non-words; perception by single consumers v. aggregate; consumer search costs approach v. product goodwill approach; US v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 8:31 am by Steve Hall
The decision was an exception to the United States Supreme Court decision in April 2008 in Baze v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 1:55 pm by Charon QC
(David Allen Green in his Jack of Kent blog explains the reference to Pressdram v Arkell if you are not aware of the meaning.) [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 7:26 pm
  Professor Kent Bernard agreed that the Act is “weird,” but argued that it did not create the problem. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 3:37 am by Aidan O'Neill QC, Matrix Chambers
On this constitutional model, the “Scottish people” are no more sovereign than the “people of Basingstoke” or the “men of Kent” or the “women of Wales”. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 7:59 am by John Elwood
Kent Piacenti for compiling the cases in this post, and the voices in my head for drafting it. ============================================================ New Relists Mathis v. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 6:27 am by INFORRM
From the Blogs There is long post on the Jack of Kent blog with the title “Does science really still have problem with libel? [read post]