Search for: "People v. Long"
Results 321 - 340
of 19,082
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2012, 1:13 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 10:43 am
”Obergefell v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 11:26 am
The general rule is that as long as the doctor makes clear what the risks of the surgery are, they’re free to perform it. [read post]
15 May 2022, 3:21 pm
" It's by Neil Gong and Alex V. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 9:03 am
The Supreme Court unanimously ruled in Samsung v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 12:20 pm
And in the long-pending case of Ingersoll and Freed v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 12:18 pm
Kolanek and People v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 4:47 pm
In People ex rel. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:00 pm
The impact of the Blind SA Constitutional Court judgment on amendments Readers would recall that South Africa’s Constitutional Court had in Blind SA v Minister for Trade, Industry and Competition & Others unanimously declared that the Copyright Act was unconstitutional to the extent that it limited the rights of people with visual and print disabilities. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 4:33 pm
Alvarez v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 8:37 pm
When Ed Blum brought Evenwel v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 8:37 pm
When Ed Blum brought Evenwel v. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 5:58 pm
Civil litigation in Ontario is slow…..The Supreme Court of Canada decision in R. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 8:53 am
The overturning of Roe v Wade in the US in particular has cast long shadows on the end of a month meant to celebrate human rights, personhood, and dignity. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 1:05 pm
And for a long time. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 12:47 pm
That's why Vasquez will spend 50 to life in prison (or, more accurately, spend a long time, since he's not even eligible for parole for 15 years, and will be hard pressed to get out even then).Parenthetically, I always knew that one way that you can mistakenly get shot in a gang area is by wearing the wrong colors -- e.g., red or blue -- or the wrong hat (e.g, an LA Dodgers cap). [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 10:51 am
In other words, that the First District's holding is easily circumvented as long as you have a police officer -- the same officer who admittedly stopped the defendant in a pretextual search -- testify that, yeah, in his view, the stop was legitimate.I don't find that argument persuasive. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 2:29 pm
A little prevention can go a long away. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 11:27 am
"Neither the majority opinion nor dissent is overly long, and both are worth a read. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 10:59 am
In San Francisco v. [read post]
