Search for: "People v. More"
Results 321 - 340
of 43,335
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2017, 3:03 pm
Good luck with that story.One more decision, though. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 2:57 pm
Kasrawi and me, quite frankly, is that he's more brown than I am -- which I suspect might play some role in why Officer Pardue had a "hunch" that Mr. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:00 am
The post Public Citizen v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 2:43 pm
The state attempts to satisfy both by appointing people to assist the defendant. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 12:59 pm
The classic reason not to decide cases that are moot is because no one cares any more. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 10:43 am
On April 10, in People of California v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 2:11 pm
" That's self-defense, even though it's based upon a mistake of fact.You can see why we don't punish people for that. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 3:37 pm
Epton; People v. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 7:00 pm
EPA - in making regulatory law more democratic - may supersede the immediate consequences for greenhouse gas regulations.Mass v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 2:05 pm
We recently rejected a similar argument in People v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 9:53 am
The plaintiff says that TheDirty hosts a service that it knows “libels” people. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 2:26 pm
But I think that I agree with Justice Bedsworth's dissent more than I do with Justice Moore's majority opinion (even as supported by Justice O'Leary's concurrence).My dissent probably wouldn't be filled with as much rhetoric as the first couple of pages of Justice Bedsworth's dissent. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 8:37 pm
But over time, as more and more people in America have won the vote (which is a good thing!) [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 5:04 pm
Supreme Court ruled in Bostock v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 6:51 am
” Wesberry v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 3:13 pm
I understand that, sometimes, you're waiting to try to get better in the meantime, so that the result of the trial is more likely to be in your favor.But having to wait over two full years to be "reevaluated" by your doctors seems quite a bit too long.That's the backstory here, anyway. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 4:47 pm
Then they confront you with various pieces of evidence they've already obtained, and then you tell them a different story.The second story's usually just as unpersuasive -- indeed, often even more so -- than the first one. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 8:39 pm
When you're going to use your first four peremptory challenges to strike Hispanic jurors, at a minimum, you've got to be more subtle about it. [read post]
26 May 2016, 9:17 am
But in a perfect world, you'd want a lot more than the (notoriously unreliable) eyewitness evidence that was the basic reason for defendant's conviction.No winners here. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 11:56 am
Nor do I think that the relevant brand needs to get any more publicity.But in four different places in this opinion, Justice Benke refers to one of the victims as exclusively smoking "Marlborough cigarettes". [read post]
