Search for: "People v. Novo" Results 321 - 340 of 503
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Do the traditions of people who were enslaved count or only those of the enslavers as reflected in the laws enacted by the representatives of the enslavers? [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 11:28 am
  On a de novo review, the appellate court affirmed. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 5:47 am by Nicholas Weaver
This clearly qualifies as "metadata" under Smith v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 2:17 pm by Jason Rantanen
If that’s the case, why in the world are people advocating more deference to district courts? [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 3:37 am by Russ Bensing
Williams (discussed here), holding that the Adam Walsh Act was punitive, and couldn’t be applied retroactively to people who committed offenses prior to its effective date. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:31 am by Wolfgang Demino
When both parties move for summary judgment and the trial court grants one motion but denies the other, we review the evidence produced by each party, determine de novo all questions presented, and render the judgment the trial court should have rendered. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:31 am by Wolfgang Demino
When both parties move for summary judgment and the trial court grants one motion but denies the other, we review the evidence produced by each party, determine de novo all questions presented, and render the judgment the trial court should have rendered. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:51 am by Russ Bensing
Last week, in State v. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 6:57 am by Bernard Bell
  The “review” of prosecutors’ decisions regarding a person’s guilt, in the form of deciding to prosecute, is de novo and not limited to the record upon which the prosecutor acted. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 3:50 am by Russ Bensing
”  The opinion cites the 10th District’s decision in State v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 8:53 am by Sarah Grant
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit heard oral argument in Force v. [read post]