Search for: "People v. Part"
Results 321 - 340
of 25,435
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2014, 4:08 pm
You can't "mix and match" and apply one rule to one part of the sentence and another to the rest.Hmmm. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 1:04 pm
Tough to keep out.But until today, I had no idea that mental health institutions that serve Sexually Violent Predators apparently have a similarly widespread problem with the internal distribution of . . . child pornography.Wow.Here's a part of what today's published opinion says about the subject:"CSH is a maximum-security psychiatric hospital with a patient population of 1,100, between 80 to 85 percent of whom are sexually violent predators. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 3:37 pm
To foreshadow: He's a prior felon, and part of his sentence for this whole affair includes a conviction for attempted arson. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 11:01 am
And it's true that the defendant here appears to have been caught on a home video camera entering the home; that he was apprehended by the police near the residence a short time later; and that he matched the description of the person on the video and was caught holding a knife stored in the garage.So I have no real dispute with the part of Justice Gilbert's concluding paragraph that these facts "show overwhelming evidence of guilt. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 11:45 am
Don't forget we're part of a global community. [read post]
21 May 2008, 12:38 am
R v Bassett; [2008] WLR (D) 157 “For an offence of voyeurism to be committed, within the definition in s 67 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003, there had to be a private act which involved parts of the body for which people would normally expect privacy, as defined by s 68(1). [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 8:48 am
Today’s Supreme Court decision on affirmative action is part of the backlash. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 9:15 am
An interesting case is Hicks v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 8:52 pm
It should also be pointed out that the categorical v. case-by-case debate is not some new thing that just occurred to people in 2009. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 9:34 am
Although frustrated by the delay, the court denied the petition, citing Garcia v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm
” As I explained in an earlier post, Congress intended RFRA to incorporate by reference the Supreme Court’s Free Exercise Clause jurisprudence from the era preceding Employment Division v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 12:00 pm
And I hope both that Detective Serrata does not hear the end of this one, as well as that the other people involved in this controversy know they did the right thing and would do it again. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 8:35 pm
With oral argument scheduled for Monday in Wyeth v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 10:51 am
A prosecutor who wishes to remain anonymous has this to say in response to my Us v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 7:56 am
This is why people must be extremely wary in signing these waivers. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 9:04 pm
” Howell v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 3:37 pm
Epton; People v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 9:10 am
Finally, the claim in A centres on a woman who is part of a State-run “Sanctuary Scheme” to protect her from a violent ex-partner; as part of the scheme, a room in her house has been converted into a “panic room” which can be locked down in case of emergency. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 11:11 am
Look, I'll do my part. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 9:38 am
Ted Olson and David Boies, who fought opposing sides of Bush v. [read post]
