Search for: "People v. Part"
Results 321 - 340
of 25,838
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2024, 11:01 am
And it's true that the defendant here appears to have been caught on a home video camera entering the home; that he was apprehended by the police near the residence a short time later; and that he matched the description of the person on the video and was caught holding a knife stored in the garage.So I have no real dispute with the part of Justice Gilbert's concluding paragraph that these facts "show overwhelming evidence of guilt. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 12:54 pm
For its part, the Attorney General offers this court no help, instead compounding the problem with a 458-page rambling respondent’s brief plus 28-page addendum. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 9:45 am
Since you're reading something on the Internet, I thought it appropriate to highlight Justice Rushing's contemporary thoughts about this media:"The Internet contains, or more accurately is connected to and thus capable of conveying, a large and growing part of all of the recordable information in existence. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 2:04 pm
Raul Lopez and Freddie Chacon were 16 when they kidnapped a CYA librarian as part of an effort to escape from the CYA facility. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 5:12 pm
See, e.g., Tropeano v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 2:48 am
(Wilson's citation of Levin v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 11:45 am
Don't forget we're part of a global community. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 9:15 am
An interesting case is Hicks v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 8:35 pm
With oral argument scheduled for Monday in Wyeth v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 8:52 pm
It should also be pointed out that the categorical v. case-by-case debate is not some new thing that just occurred to people in 2009. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 9:04 pm
” Howell v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 10:51 am
A prosecutor who wishes to remain anonymous has this to say in response to my Us v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm
” As I explained in an earlier post, Congress intended RFRA to incorporate by reference the Supreme Court’s Free Exercise Clause jurisprudence from the era preceding Employment Division v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 9:34 am
Although frustrated by the delay, the court denied the petition, citing Garcia v. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 9:21 am
See Banks v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 3:37 pm
Epton; People v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 7:29 am
Justice Thomas wrote separately to concur in part. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 7:56 am
This is why people must be extremely wary in signing these waivers. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 12:00 pm
And I hope both that Detective Serrata does not hear the end of this one, as well as that the other people involved in this controversy know they did the right thing and would do it again. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 11:11 am
Look, I'll do my part. [read post]
