Search for: "People v. Powers" Results 321 - 340 of 15,377
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2010, 9:56 am by Jon
How creative do officials have to get in depriving people of their rights until courts and the people say it has become downright bizarre? [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 11:05 am by JB
Because so many powerful and influential people made these arguments, mainstream media felt compelled to treat them as serious legal claims and this also helped support their reasonableness.The composition of the federal bench also matters, because an argument is more likely to be thought plausible, and possibly succeed, if many federal judges are likely to entertain it and take it seriously.Let's apply this analysis to Texas v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 9:09 am by Jeff Gamso
  Still, I know there are people of good will who disagree. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
 The brief complaint (full text) in People of the United States of America and the State of California v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:55 am
This is such a case.Or at least that's the opinion of Justice Rushing, who writes a very powerful -- and lengthy (46-page) -- opinion. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 11:56 am
  The trial court had the power to reject the plea. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 8:22 am by Eric Goldman
That’s not novel; other courts have similarly recognized the meaning-flipping power of emojis (see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 5:05 am by Scott Bomboy
In 1824, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall’s opinion in Gibbons v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 12:54 am by rhapsodyinbooks
On this day in history, US Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall, writing for a unanimous Court, ruled in United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:48 pm
And as if that wasn't enough, many of the people in gover [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 9:51 am by Staff Writer
  In 1994, RICO charges were successfully brought up against pro-life activists in NOW v. [read post]
Yes, constitutional law has been used to oppress Native people, but at the same time, we want to bring to the fore how Native arguments led, for example, to seminal cases such as Worcester v. [read post]