Search for: "People v. Race" Results 321 - 340 of 5,002
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2023, 4:42 am by SHG
If you want to really shred precedent, why not start with Marbury v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
” (Jackson himself called Thomas “Uncle Clarence” after the Dobbs decision overturning Roe v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 7:37 am by Phil Dixon
No Bivens remedy against BOP officials for alleged First Amendment, procedural due process, or race-based discrimination violations Mays v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 6:13 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
After the Supreme Court invalidated the use of race in college admissions in SFFA v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:00 pm
# # ## # #DECISIONC. v County of Westchester [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 10:32 am by Amy Howe
” But the challengers countered that the legislators’ reliance on race was “impermissible even if mapmakers used race as a proxy for politics. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 1:48 am by centerforartlaw
Referring to the backlash, she discussed the issues at stake, especially the aftermath of the overturn of Roe v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm by Legal Aggregate
The headline in The Economist reads: “A new Supreme Court case may dampen protections for LGBT people. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 8:05 am
This applies not only to laws that disadvantage or denigrate people on the basis of race, but also laws that are designed to provide benefits to people on the basis of race. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 11:43 am by David Super
  Nine years after Bakke, McCleskey v. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 2:02 am by Tammy Binford, Contributing Editor
President and Fellows of Harvard College and Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 8:26 am by Edward T. Kang and Kandis Kovalsky
PoW verifies transactions by using an algorithm to provide a complex mathematical problem that computers race to solve. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
” He alleged that the prosecutor had used his peremptory challenges to keep more Blacks from serving on his jury.In Batson v Kentucky, the Court held that “While a defendant is not entitled to have a jury completely or partially composed of people of his own race, the state is not permitted to use its peremptory challenges to automatically exclude potential members of the jury because of their race. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:32 am by David Post
  Because she is offering no services (yet) to anyone, she has not "denied her services" (yet) to anyone based on their race, creed, or sexual orientation. [read post]