Search for: "People v. Rices" Results 321 - 340 of 418
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
(Afro-IP)   Australia USPTO Extends patent prosecution highway pilot with Australia and begins pilot with Germany (Patent Docs)   Canada Copyright Board releases satellite radio royalty decision (Michael Geist) Canadian Recording Industry Association (CRIA) launching grassroots campaign for Canadian DMCA (Michael Geist) Goldstein introduces patent reform bill to ease access to medicines (Michael Geist)   China US ITC victory over sucralose patents for Chinese manufacturers… [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
The ICO concluded that there is always meaningful human involvement in the decision-making process but recommended that local authorities identify risks to people’s privacy, maintain transparency and ensure GDPR compliance. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:12 pm by INFORRM
The state of Victoria is leading the push to extend the existing defamation defence of absolute privilege to people who make complaints to police and bodies such as anti-discrimination commissions and professional disciplinary bodies. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am by INFORRM
The Norweigan hacker Runa Sandvik has launched Granitt, a service for at-risk people like activists, journalists and refugees. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 12:31 am
In other words, people have differing opinions of food. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 9:05 pm by Guest Opinion
Our own experiences in supermarkets show that along with the shelves that held flour, rice and beans, the shelves that held crackers, chips, ramen noodles, soda, sugary cereals, and processed ready to eat meals are quite empty”. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 8:15 am by Marty Lederman
(distinguishing between constitutionally protected advocacy and "the act of enticing or importuning on a personal basis for personal benefit or gain"), and People v. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
On 1 August 2022, judgment was handed down in Wright v McCormack [2022] EWHC 2068 (QB) by Chamberlain J. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 3:47 pm by lawmrh
Wade, the “ultimate judicial usurpation” and piles his own dollop of foam on the ‘Obama v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 9:00 pm by Karel Frielink
In both, the jury must use its experience with people and events in weighing the probabilities. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 9:43 pm
See: USA v Amawi.However, the possibility that the American defendants might be "brought to justice"outside the extradition process might give pause to some who had assumed that this only affected non-citizens. [read post]