Search for: "People v. Superior Court (Persons)" Results 321 - 340 of 2,125
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2016, 7:00 am by Jill Fitzgerald
This means that you are liable even if you take reasonable precautions to prevent harm.In a recent Pennsylvania Superior Court Case, Franciscus v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 3:51 am
Source: https://www.casebriefs.com/blog/law/torts/torts-keyed-to-vetri/negligent-infliction-of-emotional-distress-torts-keyed-to-vetri/burgess-v-superior-court/Read More [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 11:10 am by Jennifer Lynch
Earlier this summer, EFF filed an amicus brief in People v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 3:53 pm by Glotzer & Sweat
Superior Court, 21 Cal.3d 144 - California Supreme Court held that a non-commercial supplier of alcohol [apartment complex owner and manager] could be held liable for injuries caused by drunken participants to third parties harmed by the intoxicated person). [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 6:47 am by Phil Dixon
The trial court’s instruction allowed the jury to find that the defendant conspired with “at least one other person. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:06 am by Lana Ulrich
As Wurman and Fredrickson write, the Court concluded “that the law treated people differently based on race because it prohibited marriage based on the race of the other party to the marriage. [read post]
30 May 2023, 10:37 am by Fauzan Siddiqui
The class action was initially certified at the Superior Court level, however the Province appealed to the Division Court. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 12:32 pm by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
In March and April of this year, the roads were mostly empty as people huddled up at home under unprecedented stay-at-home orders from the government. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:36 am
Some 2,000 individual plaintiffs filed a complaint in the Superior Court of the U.S. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 11:40 am
Deutsch Larrimore Farnish & Anderson, LLP, 876 A.2d 1044 (Pennsylvania Superior Court 2005). [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 10:38 am
In a case demonstrating the challenges of addressing aboriginal representation on Ontario juries, the Ontario Superior Court has rejected an application to have a sheriff found guilty of fraud, partiality or wilful misconduct over the lack of First Nations members on the panel.In R. v. [read post]