Search for: "People v. Wells"
Results 321 - 340
of 26,913
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2025, 12:00 pm
Hargis v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:41 pm
" Seems like I'm guilty of pandering in that situation as well given Justice Kriegler's holding in this case, which concludes that even trying (as here) to convince an existing prostitute counts as pandering; e.g., as precedent reflects, that a "substantial potential for social harm is revealed even by the act of encouraging an established prostitute to alter her business relations.This may be another one of those areas where we deliberately pass statutes that are… [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 12:30 pm
It's a mathematical (as well as human) certainty. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 2:17 am
The dust is starting to settle in the widely publicised case of Bragg v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 4:26 am
” NEH Twitter icon: It might not be the best idea to try to stop people from doing what comes naturally. [read post]
4 May 2021, 6:12 am
Criminal procedure — Brady violation — Investigators’ notes Mark Hollingsworth shot and killed two people and seriously injured a third on January 18, 1998. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 1:30 pm
Oh well. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 9:47 am
In District of Columbia v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 4:07 pm
Choy, People v Hawkins and People v White. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm
It simply seems like it's rebutted in situations in which, as here, everyone agrees that the impropriety resulted in (1) an acquittal on an offense that lots of jurors thought the guy was guilty of, and (2) a conviction in which all the jurors already thought the guy was guilty (and a portion of whom were merely hoping to convict on a greater offense).The case that Justice Robie cites for prejudice in this context is People v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 1:48 pm
There's a California Supreme Court case called People v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 11:51 am
In Carter v. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 7:57 am
(Well, actually, nine people know, but they wear robes, and they're not talking.)There are two possibilities.On the one hand, Kent created a circuit split. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 10:45 am
AARP v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 10:45 am
AARP v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 10:31 am
" Otherwise the gynecologist is also guilty, for they surely perform the physical movements of the act, and voluntarily so.The erroneous instruction here may well be harmless, because there was no evidence that Mr. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 2:06 pm
Well done here. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 3:16 pm
As well as sad. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 1:04 pm
Which leads one to believe that, well, maybe, appellant did contend that the officers should have been designated pursuant to Section 801.Which in turn makes me think: Well, what about that?! [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 1:22 pm
Landry might well be seen as a monster as well; someone who needs to be "put down" before he kills yet again.At the same time, Mr. [read post]
