Search for: "Peoples v. Peoples" Results 321 - 340 of 72,519
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2009, 10:27 am
Since the employees "possessed" the property (even though it was owned by the owner), you deprived these people of their possessory interest by force, and hence are guilty of robbery.I understand the reasoning. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 2:01 pm
Went on a crime spree on the night of June 30, 2007, robbing a lot of people at gunpoint alongside others in his gang. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:43 pm
  Though I hope not too in common.The relevant people live in San Diego. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 12:30 pm
Happy post-Thanksgiving.I don't know how many people actually work the day after Thanksgiving. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 8:55 am by Howard Wasserman
Here is my SCOTUSBlog recap of Monday's argument in Nieves v. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 2:33 am by Tessa Shepperson
Street v Mumford ruled that the tenant can refuse anyone access to the property, even the Landlord. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 11:37 am
"Which is, I guess, theoretically true -- once the California Supreme Court decides something, barring its reconsideration of this issue, the only thing left is to ask the Legislature to change the law.But I'm fairly sure that the class of people who drive drunk and kill people don't exactly have awesome lobbyists in the California Legislature. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:07 pm
  That's a huge deal.Still, there are plenty of people who deliberately kill people that don't sentenced to 19 years. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 1:20 pm
  But how does one in fact apply the thing to people who've been in custody the whole time? [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 1:30 pm
 The People say whatever the trial court decides is fine.So the trial court enters an order that keeps the 14 months in jail but then let's the guy get deported.The People then appeal. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 5:25 pm by Stephen Bilkis
2018 NY Slip 00005 By order of the Supreme Court on May 13, 2016, which heard a case against the defendant who is a level 1 sex offender. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 10:47 am by Stephen Bilkis
NY Slip Op. 07041 This is an appeal from a judgment entered on 11-20-14 against the defendant. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 10:24 pm by Stephen Bilkis
2018 Slip Op 00855 This case was an appeal from the Supreme Court, where the defendant was categorized as a Level Two sex offender. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 5:00 pm
Or even low-level "investments," like the ones here, where you're getting five figures from people in your church to market a dubious product on the basis of exceptionally dubious representations. [read post]