Search for: "Peter Margulies"
Results 321 - 340
of 375
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2017, 5:04 am
Peter Margulies wrote that while the episode was a slight stumble for Hawaii, the Ninth Circuit provided clear guidelines for how to move forward. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 12:09 pm
ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Peter Margulies examined the Hawaii court’s injunction against President Trump’s refugee ban and highlighted the flaws in Maryland court's injunction. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 11:57 am
Coe Professor of History and American Studies and Professor of Political Science, Stanford University Peter Raven-Hansen, Professor, Glen Earl Weston Research Professor, George Washington Law School L. [read post]
16 May 2015, 6:55 am
Peter Margulies also took aim at the 2nd Circuit decision, arguing that the ruling doesn’t properly consider the government’s use restrictions on the metadata it collects. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 11:42 am
Finally, Peter Margulies explained all that’s wrong in the ongoing debate about the efficacy of torture. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 10:45 am
Here are videos of recent online talks I gave about my book Free to Move: Foot Voting, Migration and Political Freedom for the Cato Institute (with commentary by economist Bryan Caplan and immigration law scholar Peter Margulies), and the University of Torcuato Di Tella law faculty Seminar on Law, Economics, and Regulation (Argentina). [read post]
6 Dec 2014, 5:59 am
Peter Margulies argued that President Obama’s action and the OLC’s unconvincing legal defense injured our constitutional framework. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 9:04 pm
” Both of these determinations are extremely dubious, particularly the one about relatives (see also this detailed analysis by immigration law scholar Peter Margulies). [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 3:26 am
” Thus, by finding that the conviction could rest solely on Mehanna’s trip to Yemen, the court avoids any deeper discussion of the interesting First Amendment questions that Peter Margulies and David Cole raised last year. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 1:38 pm
As immigration law scholar Peter Margulies (who believes that Travel Ban 2.0 was legal) explains, the new order is actually more vulnerable to these statutory objections than the old one, because of its more sweeping nature. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 2:51 pm
Immigration law scholar Peter Margulies has a more detailed discussion of them at the Lawfare website. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 6:55 am
Peter Margulies discussed how the opinion will shape the case going forward and argued that the judge’s opinion rightly censured the Obama administration for allowing “rhetoric to supplant reality. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 8:06 am
Roosevelt is cited in the following article: Peter Margulies, Searching For Accountability Under FISA: Internal Separation of Powers and Surveillance Law, 104 Marq. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 12:38 pm
Update: Peter Margulies contributed a terrific summary of the panel sessions, posted here at Lawfare. [read post]
15 May 2015, 9:30 am
Peter Margulies joined the FISA discussion, arguing that the 2nd Circuit decision, to its detriment, overlooks the implications of government restrictions on the use of metadata. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 6:55 am
Peter Margulies defended 702 collection as consistent with international norms, and insisted that the American surveillance program actually contains greater safeguards than their European counterparts. [read post]
16 May 2012, 2:32 pm
This discussion, like Roger Williams Law Professor Peter Margulies' post on the workshop, makes one thing perfectly clear: The interrelation of national jurisprudence with international and regional human rights jurisprudence, with international criminal law, with international humanitarian law/law of armed conflict/jus in bello, and with the Charter- and custom-based jus ad bellum, remains unsettled. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 7:45 am
" -- Peter Margulies, Lawfare [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 8:10 am
In the interest of highlighting two significant trees in a fairly dense forest (and in light of the various intervening exchanges between me and Ben Wittes, Bobby Chesney, and Peter Margulies; and the speech Senator Graham is apparently set to give tomorrow at the American Enterprise Institute), I wanted to focus more specifically on the heart of the problem--i.e., why the substantive detention authority provided by the bill is so troubling (Gabor Rona from Human Rights… [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 7:57 am
At Immigration Prof Blog, Peter Margulies responds to some of the arguments and commentary on work-authorization regulations, while Josh Blackman and Cristina Rodriguez discuss the case in a podcast for the National Constitution Center. [read post]
