Search for: "Petit v. Unknown"
Results 321 - 340
of 755
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2017, 8:36 am
The court continued that in both Terry and Pennsylvania v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 8:36 am
The court continued that in both Terry and Pennsylvania v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 7:30 am
Six Unknown Fed. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 7:56 am
Defendants then sought, and the Supreme Court granted, a petition for writ of certiorari. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 11:40 am
Marathon’s petition requested that the receiver “take charge of and execute an oil, gas, and mineral lease, or leases” on behalf of unknown owners of the mineral rights, which included Kastan and his unknown heirs. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 11:40 am
Marathon’s petition requested that the receiver “take charge of and execute an oil, gas, and mineral lease, or leases” on behalf of unknown owners of the mineral rights, which included Kastan and his unknown heirs. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 2:09 pm
Six Unknown Fed. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 4:00 am
An issued patent would be subject to retroactive scrutiny by the courts in relation to the submissions made by an applicant to the Patent Office during prosecution (generally many years prior), judged against unknown criteria. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 8:33 pm
The petition of the day is: Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 4:19 pm
A & B v Persons Unknown. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 6:00 am
Sherman v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
An issued patent would be subject to retroactive scrutiny by the courts in relation to the submissions made by an applicant to the Patent Office during prosecution (generally many years prior), judged against unknown criteria. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 5:01 am
A case in point is demonstrated by the United States Tax Courtorder in Swartz v. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 7:02 am
District of Columbia v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 3:25 am
The petition was dismissed, but the judgment has not yet been pronounced, and therefore the High Court’s reasoning is unknown, since the case involved a number of other substantive issues.BackgroundThe detailed facts of the petition are not relevant. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 3:25 am
The petition was dismissed, but the judgment has not yet been pronounced, and therefore the High Court’s reasoning is unknown, since the case involved a number of other substantive issues.BackgroundThe detailed facts of the petition are not relevant. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 2:11 pm
Hernandez v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 6:52 am
Accordingly, the court granted the petitions for review and vacated OSHA’s action (Agricultural Retailers Assn. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 8:49 pm
The trial court dismissed the petition, holding that the lawsuit was filed after CEQA’s 180-day time limit. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:51 pm
Id.We granted the State's petition for writ of certiorari to consider whether a vehicle traffic stop based only on information from an MVD records inquiry reflecting an `unknown’ compliance status for the particular vehicle is supported by reasonable suspicion.State v. [read post]
